Detecting Entanglement in Alice Without Measuring Bob

  • Thread starter Thread starter shifty123
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Entanglement
shifty123
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
First time poster:

Is there any math out there that prohibits the following scenario from taking place:

Alice and Bob are entangled. Is it possible to detect that Alice is entangled, without measuring Bob and without destroying the entanglement (or causing decoherence)?

Note: I am not trying to detect any joint information shared between Alice and Bob, just the state of Alice's entanglement without looking at Bob.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
shifty123 said:
First time poster:

Is there any math out there that prohibits the following scenario from taking place:

Alice and Bob are entangled. Is it possible to detect that Alice is entangled, without measuring Bob and without destroying the entanglement (or causing decoherence)?

Note: I am not trying to detect any joint information shared between Alice and Bob, just the state of Alice's entanglement without looking at Bob.

Welcome to PhysicsForums, shifty123!

No single (or repeated) measurement on Alice will indicate the presence of entanglement. That is because entanglement is a joint state. I.e. there are no observables at the individual particle level that reflect entanglement.
 
Thanks!
 
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Is it possible, and fruitful, to use certain conceptual and technical tools from effective field theory (coarse-graining/integrating-out, power-counting, matching, RG) to think about the relationship between the fundamental (quantum) and the emergent (classical), both to account for the quasi-autonomy of the classical level and to quantify residual quantum corrections? By “emergent,” I mean the following: after integrating out fast/irrelevant quantum degrees of freedom (high-energy modes...

Similar threads

Back
Top