Detecting fluorescence via CW or pulsed LEDs

  • Thread starter Thread starter Anton Alice
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Fluorescence Leds
AI Thread Summary
A DIY fluorometer project aims to detect protein fluorescence using a high-power LED for excitation and a phototransistor for measuring intensity. The discussion highlights the need for circuit designs capable of handling nanosecond pulsed measurements due to the short fluorescence lifetime. Continuous measurement approaches raise questions about the effectiveness of optical filters in blocking light and achieving significant attenuation under $200. The distinction between fluorescence and phosphorescence is noted, emphasizing that fluorescence occurs in the nanosecond range. Understanding these principles is crucial for developing an effective measurement system.
Anton Alice
Messages
68
Reaction score
1
Hello forums,

in the context of a little DIY-project I am planning to build a rudimentary fluorometer, which is actually doing nothing but checking whether an amount of protein is fluorescing or not, and roughly measuring its intensity.

A highpower LED is used to excite the protein to the fluorescent state, while a phototransistor (specially sensitive to the fluorescent spectrum) starts measuring a short time after the LED has been turned off.
The live time of fluorescence is in the region of a few nano seconds. For example a nanosecond pulsed measurement should (tightly) be able to solve the problem. Do you know circuitries which can handle this measurement cycle?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
I know its difficult.

For the continuous approach:
How well can optical filters block light? What is the best possible attenuation (below 200dollars)?
 
Anton Alice said:
The live time of fluorescence is in the region of a few nano seconds.
Why is the time constant so short? What is the fluorescing material?
 
One can distinguish between fast and slow decaying luminscence. The fastest kind of luminescence is fluorescence. There is also phosphorescence, which is more of an "exite, and wait until it decays", whereas fluorescence is more of a direct conversion of one wavelength to another.
http://nic.ucsf.edu/FPvisualization/#ref30
http://nic.ucsf.edu/FPvisualization/#ref30

Fluorescence is always in the nanosecond region.
 
  • Like
Likes berkeman
Hi all I have some confusion about piezoelectrical sensors combination. If i have three acoustic piezoelectrical sensors (with same receive sensitivity in dB ref V/1uPa) placed at specific distance, these sensors receive acoustic signal from a sound source placed at far field distance (Plane Wave) and from broadside. I receive output of these sensors through individual preamplifiers, add them through hardware like summer circuit adder or in software after digitization and in this way got an...
I have recently moved into a new (rather ancient) house and had a few trips of my Residual Current breaker. I dug out my old Socket tester which tell me the three pins are correct. But then the Red warning light tells me my socket(s) fail the loop test. I never had this before but my last house had an overhead supply with no Earth from the company. The tester said "get this checked" and the man said the (high but not ridiculous) earth resistance was acceptable. I stuck a new copper earth...
I am not an electrical engineering student, but a lowly apprentice electrician. I learn both on the job and also take classes for my apprenticeship. I recently wired my first transformer and I understand that the neutral and ground are bonded together in the transformer or in the service. What I don't understand is, if the neutral is a current carrying conductor, which is then bonded to the ground conductor, why does current only flow back to its source and not on the ground path...
Back
Top