Determinant Question: Show det(M) = det(A) det(D)

  • Thread starter Thread starter ehrenfest
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Determinant
Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
7 replies · 2K views
ehrenfest
Messages
2,001
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement



A is a k by k matrix, B is a k by l matrix, D is an l by l matrix.

Let M be the (k+l) by (k+l) matrix that has A in the upper left, B in the upper right, D in the lower right, and 0 in the lower left.

Show that det(M) = det(A) det(D)

Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution

 
Physics news on Phys.org
I would have posted my attempt if it had gone anywhere. But anyway, I tried to use the fact the determinant is an alternating multilinear map. I tried to use cofactor expansion and that seemed like it might work but could get really messy and I thought that there is probably a better way to do it. On second thought though, cofactor expansion might be the best approach...
 
Wait. Do you mean the first column? The first row doesn't (necessarily) have any 0s in it?
 
Last edited:
i think tou can diagonalize the bigger M matrix with an SO(k+l) rotation, the determinant should be invariant under this operation.
Now u get a block reduced matrix and you equation hold.
 
Never mind. Induction worked well. Now I want to show that if our matrix is

(A B)
(C D)

where A is k by k, B is k by l, C is l by k, D is l by l

Then its determinant is detA det(C A^(-1) B)

I have seen this before and it involves factoring the matrix into 2 triangular matrices. I forget exactly how it goes. Does anyone remember why you can do this:

(A B) = ( E 0)(A B )
(C D) ( C A^(-1) E)( 0 D - C A^(-1) B )

if that makes sense. E is the identity matrix.
 
Last edited:
Never mind. I just realized you can multiply "block" matrices block by block.