A Determination of electron temperature in an ion source

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on determining the electron temperature in an ion source using the Electron Cyclotron Resonance (ECR) method. The Saha equation is proposed as a potential tool for this calculation, with the McWhirter criterion provided to assess its applicability. Participants seek clarification on the appropriate value of ΔE, which represents the energy gap for singly charged helium, to use in the formula. Understanding this value is crucial for accurate temperature determination. The conversation emphasizes the need for precise parameters to ensure reliable results in electron temperature calculations.
HeavyIon
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
How to correctly determine the temperature of electrons in an ion source based on ECR?
Is it possible to use the Saha equation?
##\frac{n_en_i}{n_a}=\frac{g_eg_i}{g_a}*3*10^{21} T^{3/2} e^{-J/T}##
Using the search, I found the McWhirter criterion for the applicability of the formula above:
##n_e >>1.6*10^{12}T^{1/2}*\Delta E^3##
Here ##n_e## is the electron density in ##cm^{-3}##, T is the electron temperature in ##eV##, and ##\Delta E## is the largest energy gap between upper and lower energy states that corresponds to one of the spectral lines used. I don't quite understand what \Delta E value should be considered in my case? I'm getting singly charged helium.
 
Thread 'Why higher speeds need more power if backward force is the same?'
Power = Force v Speed Power of my horse = 104kgx9.81m/s^2 x 0.732m/s = 1HP =746W Force/tension in rope stay the same if horse run at 0.73m/s or at 15m/s, so why then horse need to be more powerfull to pull at higher speed even if backward force at him(rope tension) stay the same? I understand that if I increase weight, it is hrader for horse to pull at higher speed because now is backward force increased, but don't understand why is harder to pull at higher speed if weight(backward force)...

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
0
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
1K