Determine a direction vector when a line perpendicular and a point is given

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around finding the direction vector of a line that is perpendicular to a given line defined by the equation r=[-1,0,1] + t [2,3,-2] and passes through the point (-7,-9,7). The problem is situated within the context of vector mathematics and geometry.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the use of the dot product to find the direction vector and explore the implications of their calculations. There are attempts to derive the value of the parameter t and questions about the correctness of their results.

Discussion Status

Several participants have shared their calculations and expressed uncertainty about the next steps. There is a recognition that the original point lies on the given line, leading to discussions about the nature of perpendicular lines in three-dimensional space. The conversation reflects a mix of exploration and clarification of concepts.

Contextual Notes

Participants note potential miscalculations and the implications of the point being on the original line, which raises questions about the uniqueness of the perpendicular line in three dimensions.

euro94
Messages
26
Reaction score
0
Find the direction vector of the line perpendicular to the line r=[-1,0,1] + t [2,3,-2] and passing through the point (-7,-9,7)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
welcome to pf!

hi euro94! welcome to pf! :wink:

show us what you've tried, and where you're stuck, and then we'll know how to help! :smile:
 
I tried finding the dot product of the line's direction vector with a vector from (-7,9,7). I tried (-1+2t, 3t, 1-2t) - (-7,-9,7) and I dotted it with (2,-3,2) and made it equal to zero, and then i got stuck :(
 
euro94 said:
I tried finding the dot product of the line's direction vector with a vector from (-7,9,7). I tried (-1+2t, 3t, 1-2t) - (-7,-9,7) and I dotted it with (2,-3,2) and made it equal to zero, and then i got stuck :(

(you mean (2,3,-2)?)

that should work …

what did you get?​
 
I got (6+2t,3t+9,6-2t) and i dotted it with (2,3,-2) and then i made it equal to zero and i got 12+4t+9t+27-12+4t and i solved for t and i got -27/17, but I'm not sure what to do next..
 
i mean i got a value of -27/14 for t, i had a miscalculation, but I am not sure what step to take next
 
hi euro94! :smile:

(just got up :zzz:)
euro94 said:
i mean i got a value of -27/14 for t, i had a miscalculation, but I am not sure what step to take next


that value of the parameter (t) gives you the foot of the perpendicular …

so put it into [-1,0,1] + t [2,3,-2] to give you the actual coordinates,

and then join that to [-7,-9,7] :smile:
 
oppsss, i got t=-3 and i plugged it into the equation and i got that my direction vector is [-7,-9,7] and so my overall equation is r=[-7,-9,7] + t[-7,-9,7]
 
is that normal?
 
  • #10
you mean it goes through the origin? :smile:

can you please write it all out in one go, if you want it checked? :wink:
 
  • #11
okay :)
(-1+2t, 3t, 1-2t) - (-7,-9,7) = (6+2t, 3t+9, -6-2t)
dot product:
(6+2t, 3t+9, -6-2t) dot (2,3,-2) =0
12+4t+9t+27+12+4t =0
51+17t=0
-51/17=t
-3=t
r=[-1,0,1] + 3 [2,3,-2]
= [-7,-9,7]
 
  • #12
is that right? :)
 
  • #13
euro94 said:
okay :)
(-1+2t, 3t, 1-2t) - (-7,-9,7) = (6+2t, 3t+9, -6-2t)
dot product:
(6+2t, 3t+9, -6-2t) dot (2,3,-2) =0
12+4t+9t+27+12+4t =0
51+17t=0
-51/17=t
-3=t
r=[-1,0,1] + 3 [2,3,-2]
= [-7,-9,7]

hmm … that's weird! :rolleyes:

yes, your caluculations are fine :smile:

looking back at the original question now, obviously [-7,-9,7] does actually lie on the original line …

so (since we're in three dimensions), asking for "the line perpendicular" makes no sense, since there's an infinite number of them! :confused:
 
  • #14
thank youu :)
 

Similar threads

Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K