Determine distance with constant acceleration

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves a particle that reverses its direction while moving with constant acceleration. The original poster seeks to determine the distance traveled during this motion, given an initial velocity and a time frame for the change in direction.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the application of kinematic equations, questioning the interpretation of displacement versus distance traveled. There are attempts to clarify the role of acceleration and time in the calculations.

Discussion Status

Several participants are exploring different interpretations of the problem, particularly regarding the correct use of time and acceleration in the equations. Some guidance has been offered on how to separate the motion into distinct parts to better understand the total distance traveled.

Contextual Notes

There is some confusion regarding the use of time values and the calculation of acceleration, with participants debating the implications of using half the total time in their equations. The original poster's textbook appears to influence their understanding of the problem setup.

brunettegurl
Messages
138
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A particle moving at 5m/s reverses its direction in 1 s to move at 5m/s in the opposite direction. If its acceleration is constant, what distance does it travel?


Homework Equations



x=volt+0.5at^2; a=(vf-vi)/t

The Attempt at a Solution



total time is 1s therefore acceleration is 10m/s^2 and then I'm stuck because when I input the value into the equation I'm not getting the answer of 2.5m which is the correct answer.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
hi brunettegurl! :wink:

i think it means that it goes 1.25m in 0.5s, and then 1.25m back again, = 2.5m

try again :smile:
 
That's slightly tricky because in the equation you gave x is not the distance traveled but merely a coordinate describing the location. To highlight the difference: if I go for a stroll and come back home then my location will be the same as before, but I obviously traveled some distance. In your case, if you properly plugged in all values (taking into account the relative signs, because the acceleration is in opposite direction than the starting velocity) you should have ended up with x=0, which is completely correct but not the sought-for variable.
The solution to your problem is to realize that the distance traveled consists of a part that the particle moved to positive x-direction and a part where it traveled into negative x-directions. Treat these two parts separately and you get the correct result.

btw.: In the future, please also give the incorrect result you got, because that can greatly help understanding what went wrong.
 
Hi

I'm still a little confused my book states that to find distance we use half the total time in the equation w/acceleration and then solve for x by doubling the answer for total distance by doing this ::

a=(5-(-5))/0.5= 20m/s^2

and when plugged into the equation x=(-5)(1)+ (0.50)(20)(1)^2
x(displacemnt)=5m and doubling this answer gives 10m

tiny-tim how did you get 1.25 as the distance traveled in 0.5s??

Thanks
 
hi brunettegurl! :smile:

no, it's not 20 m/s2, it's still 10, isn't it? :wink:
 
Im sorry how is it still 10 when you divide by time which is 0.5 now according to the explanation (1/2 the time) making the 10 now a 20 as acceleration
 
brunettegurl said:
[A particle moving at 5m/s reverses its direction in 1 s to move at 5m/s in the opposite direction. If its acceleration is constant, what distance does it travel?

it goes from +5 to -5 in 1 s (or from +5 to 0 in 0.5 s) …

that's 10 !
 
ohhh so for acceleration the vf would be 0 and vi would be +5 giving the acceleration of 10 .. correct?

so then when we sub in the values in x=(5)(1)+ (0.50)(10)(1)^2
i still get an x(displacemnt) value of =10m and doubling this answer gives 20m

do i continue to use 0.5 as my time value and then since it is reversing in the same scalar value of 5 just dbl the new x-value??
 
brunettegurl said:
so then when we sub in the values in x=(5)(1)+ (0.50)(10)(1)^2
i still get an x(displacemnt) value of =10m and doubling this answer gives 20m

(try using the X2 icon just above the Reply box :wink:)

that 1 should be 0.5, and that + should be - :redface:
 
  • #10
Ok Thanks I understand now ... I think what confused me when I was reading the explanation in my book was the implication that 2 different time values were to be used... Thank you :)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
15K
  • · Replies 38 ·
2
Replies
38
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K