Determine if the next number will be larger or smaller

  • Thread starter Thread starter msticky
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around predicting the next number in a sequence based on previous values. The average of the provided numbers is calculated as 6.8, leading to the expectation that the next number might be smaller following a large value like 35. However, it is emphasized that without a defined rule or pattern for how the numbers are generated, making accurate predictions is impossible. The conversation highlights that any proposed next number could be valid if it adheres to a specific sequence rule. Ultimately, the ability to determine the next number relies on understanding the underlying generation method.
msticky
Messages
12
Reaction score
0
4
5
7
1
1
2
8
3
35
2

If I get the average of the numbers above I get 6.8

Its seems to me that I should be able to determine if the next number will be larger or smaller
by the last few numbers.

For instance the second last value of 35 is large, should I not get a series of smaller numbers?

Can I determine if the next numbers will be lower and when they may get larger?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
msticky said:
4
5
7
1
1
2
8
3
35
2

If I get the average of the numbers above I get 6.8

Its seems to me that I should be able to determine if the next number will be larger or smaller
by the last few numbers.

For instance the second last value of 35 is large, should I not get a series of smaller numbers?

Can I determine if the next numbers will be lower and when they may get larger?
There is no way to determine a unique next number unless you give a rule for how they are generated.

For example, I can just say that the next number is ##3+5i##. This is perfectly true if I define a pointwise sequence with the last term being ##3+5i##.
 
Without information on the rule, probability distribution and/or the allowed range of numbers, there's no way to tell.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...

Similar threads

Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
55
Views
5K
Replies
8
Views
1K
Replies
8
Views
2K
Back
Top