Determine the Acceleration of the of the Initally Stationary Block

  • Thread starter Thread starter Northbysouth
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Acceleration Block
Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on determining the acceleration of a 15-kg block subjected to a 33-N force while considering ideal wheels and small feet. Initial calculations involved summing forces in both x and y directions, leading to the determination of vertical forces and moments about point B. The user struggled with the unknown horizontal force Bx and the frictional force F, realizing that Bx should not exist due to the ideal wheel assumption. After recalculating moments about the center of the block, the correct acceleration was found to be 0.9392 m/s², highlighting the importance of considering the center of mass for translational acceleration. The conversation emphasizes the need to differentiate between rotational and translational forces in such problems.
Northbysouth
Messages
241
Reaction score
2

Homework Statement



Determine the acceleration a of the initially stationary 15-kg body when the 33-N force P is applied as shown. The small wheels at B are ideal, and the feet at A are small.

I have attached an image of the problem


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



I started with summing the forces in the x and y direction:

ƩFx: max = P - Bx - F

ƩFy: may = By -mg + A

Then I took the moment about B to get:

ƩMB =0 = -hP +.5lmg - lA

A = [0.5mg - hP]/l

A = 52.895 N

From here I am then able to determine the value of By by using my equation for the sum of the forces in the y-direction

By = 94.255 N

I know that Fmax = usA

Hence Fmax = 23.2738 N

But how do I then determine Bx and F? I believe that I need to ensure the block is actually moving, but Bx remains unknown so I cannot determine whether F is greater than its maximum value.

I had tried taking the moment about another point, the top right corner of the box, which gave me an equation containing Bx and F, which I had then solved for F so I could plug it into my ƩFx equation, but I feel as though Bx would vary depending on whether the block was in motion or not, because the value of F would change.

Can someone clarify this for me?

Thank you
 

Attachments

  • dyn 6.009.png
    dyn 6.009.png
    16.2 KB · Views: 1,052
Physics news on Phys.org
Just checking to start with:

Then I took the moment about B to get:
ƩMB =0 = -hP +.5lmg - lA
By "l" you mean "L" in your diagram?

A = [0.5mg - hP]/l
A = 52.895 N
... it is usually better practice to leave the number crunching to the end.
Leave ##AL=\frac{1}{2}mg - hP##.

For #B_x## ... you know that point B is an ideal wheel. What is the horizontal resistance of an ideal wheel?
F is friction - in order to just get the contraption moving you must have just overcome which kind of friction?
 
You are correct in the assumption that "l" is equal to "L" in the diagram.

I recognize that there is no Bx force, somehow I confused the wheel with a pin, not quite sure how I managed to do that...

Also, I recognize that F = ukA

Hence, shouldn't I get:

ax = [P-ukA]/L

which gives me 20.73 m/s2

but it says its wrong and I don't understand where my mistake is. Is there something wrong with how I calculated A by summing the moments about B?
 
You can check by treating as a free-body and finding out the sum of forces through the center of mass.
 
So, I looked at my calculations again; this time I took the moment about the center of the block. In doing this I was able to find the value of A and hence I correctly calculated the acceleration to be a = 0.9392 m/s^2.

Why did I get an incorrect value for A when I took the moment about B? What makes this scenario different to any earlier material I've studied?

Also, could you expand on what you mean by finding the sum of the forces through the center mass, please?
 
In a free body, any force acting on the body can be split into components through the center of mass and perpendicular to it. The perpendicular component rotates the body. The other one translates it. You were interested in the translational acceleration.

You should be able to figure out which effect you missed out by comparing the free-body equations with the previous ones. See how many of your original terms can be extracted. What's left will tell you what happened.
 
Thread 'Correct statement about size of wire to produce larger extension'
The answer is (B) but I don't really understand why. Based on formula of Young Modulus: $$x=\frac{FL}{AE}$$ The second wire made of the same material so it means they have same Young Modulus. Larger extension means larger value of ##x## so to get larger value of ##x## we can increase ##F## and ##L## and decrease ##A## I am not sure whether there is change in ##F## for first and second wire so I will just assume ##F## does not change. It leaves (B) and (C) as possible options so why is (C)...

Similar threads

Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
1K
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
61
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 44 ·
2
Replies
44
Views
4K
Replies
11
Views
1K