Determine the capacitor value so that this circuit is in resonance

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on determining the capacitor value required for resonance in a circuit with an inductor of 100 mH and a frequency of 159 Hz. The inductive reactance (XL) is calculated to be 99.90 Ω, and the impedance in parallel (Z_parallel) is derived using the formula Z_parallel = [(XL∠90º)*R2] / [(XL∠90º)+R2]. Participants emphasize the importance of using complex numbers to represent impedances and highlight the need to consider phase angles when combining resistances and reactances in series.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of inductive reactance (XL) and capacitive reactance (XC)
  • Familiarity with complex numbers in electrical engineering
  • Knowledge of impedance calculations in AC circuits
  • Basic principles of resonance in RLC circuits
NEXT STEPS
  • Learn about calculating capacitive reactance (XC) for resonance conditions
  • Study the use of complex impedance in AC circuit analysis
  • Explore resonance in RLC circuits and its applications
  • Investigate the impact of phase angles on impedance calculations
USEFUL FOR

Electrical engineers, students studying circuit theory, and professionals involved in AC circuit design and analysis will benefit from this discussion.

baywa2
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Homework Statement
Need to determine capacitor value so that the circuit is in resonance
Relevant Equations
E=21∠0º
ω=10^3 rad/s
R1=10Ω
R2=40Ω
L=100mh
C=?
246672

L=100mh=0.1H
ω=10^3 rad/s -> f = 159Hz
XL= ωL= 2πfL= 2π*159*0.1= 99.90 Ω
Z parallel = [(XL∠90º)*R2] / [(XL∠90º)-R2]= 37.13∠-21.8º
XC= 1/ωC= 1/(2 π f C)
I don't see how I am supposed to get to C
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
baywa2 said:
L=100mh=0.1H
ω=10^3 rad/s -> f = 159Hz
XL= ωL= 2πfL= 2π*159*0.1= 99.90 Ω
OK. Here, it is easier to use XL = ωL rather than XL = 2πfL. Your value of 99.90 has a bit of round off error.
Z parallel = [(XL∠90º)*R2] / [(XL∠90º)-R2]
Check the sign of R2 in the denominator.

Are you familiar with using complex numbers to represent impedances? For me, that makes things easier.
I don't see how I am supposed to get to C
Think about how to combine the resistance R1 and the reactance of C with the result for Z_parallel. Can you see that C, R1, and Z_parallel are all in series?
 
  • Like
Likes baywa2
Ok
so Z parallel = [(XL∠90º)*R2] / [(XL∠90º)+R2]
I get Z is some 37 Ω
So do I then use R1 and C for Z? Z=R1+XC∠-90º
Then add the Z and Zpar? 10+37+XC∠-90º -> 47+XC∠-90º
 
baywa2 said:
Ok
so Z parallel = [(XL∠90º)*R2] / [(XL∠90º)+R2]
I get Z is some 37 Ω
There should also be a phase angle for the 37 Ω.

So do I then use R1 and C for Z? Z=R1+XC∠-90º
Then add the Z and Zpar? 10+37+XC∠-90º -> 47+XC∠-90º
You can't combine the 10 and the 37 to get 47 since the 37 has a nonzero phase angle. It's like adding vectors. The 10 Ω corresponds to a vector pointing along the x-axis since it has zero phase angle. The 37 Ω corresponds to a vector pointing at some angle above the x axis.
 
The book claims the answer is that all the magnitudes are the same because "the gravitational force on the penguin is the same". I'm having trouble understanding this. I thought the buoyant force was equal to the weight of the fluid displaced. Weight depends on mass which depends on density. Therefore, due to the differing densities the buoyant force will be different in each case? Is this incorrect?

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
6K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
2K