Determine the net torque acting about the center of mass

AI Thread Summary
The net torque calculation presented is initially stated as 357 Nm, but it is pointed out that this value is incorrect due to not converting distances from centimeters to meters. A correct calculation yields 3.50 N-m clockwise when using g = 9.81 m/s². Participants emphasize the importance of factoring out constants like 2g for clarity in calculations. Additionally, they note that answers should be reported to the appropriate number of significant figures based on the provided data. Overall, the discussion highlights the need for careful unit conversion and adherence to significant figure rules in torque calculations.
paulimerci
Messages
287
Reaction score
47
Homework Statement
A triangle is suspended from the center of mass located at point O and has four 2 Kg mass suspended at
points A, B, C and D. The angles to points A, B, C and D are measured from the horizontal through the
center of mass where θA = 30 ̊ below, θB = 20 ̊ below, θC = 60 ̊ above and
θD = 80 ̊ above. The distances from point O to points A, B, C, and D are
20 cm, 35 cm, 15 cm and 30 cm respectively. Determine the net torque
acting about the center of mass.
Relevant Equations
T = F × r × sinθ
Net torque = 2gx20xcos30 - 2gx35xcos20 - 2gx15xcos60 + 2gx30xcos80
= -357Nm
Have I done it right?
 

Attachments

  • Screen Shot 2022-10-30 at 6.07.18 AM.png
    Screen Shot 2022-10-30 at 6.07.18 AM.png
    15.2 KB · Views: 126
Physics news on Phys.org
It seems correct to me.
I got 3.50 N-m clockwise, by using g=9.81
I would have written 2g as a common factor.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes paulimerci
Lnewqban said:
It seems correct to me.
I got 350.4 N-m clockwise, by using g=9.81
I would have written 2g as a common factor.
Thank you!
 
  • Like
Likes Lnewqban
Remember the distances are given in cm, not metres.

(Edit- original message deleted.)
 
Steve4Physics said:
Remember the distances are given in cm, not metres.
Thanks, yes I should have done that. I used g = 10m/s2. And I did factoring out 2g in my worksheet but didn't include in the equation above.
 
paulimerci said:
Thanks, yes I should have done that. I used g = 10m/s2. And I did factoring out 2g in my worksheet but didn't include in the equation above.
Hi @paulimerci. If you haven't already spotted it, note that your answer (357Nm) is 100 times too big (because you haven't converted cm to metres).

Also, the data are supplied to 1 or 2 significant figures. Giving the final answer to more than 2 significant figures isn’t good practice.
 
  • Like
Likes Lnewqban
Thanks for pointing out, hope I should not do this mistake again.
 
  • Like
Likes Steve4Physics
Steve4Physics said:
Remember the distances are given in cm, not metres.

(Edit- original message deleted.)
Thank you, I have edited post #2.
Then, I got 3.50 N-m clockwise.
 
  • Like
Likes paulimerci
Back
Top