Determine the net torque acting about the center of mass

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating the net torque acting about the center of mass, with participants analyzing their calculations and the factors involved in the torque equation.

Discussion Character

  • Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants share their calculations for net torque, questioning the correctness of their results and the units used. There is a focus on the significance of converting distances from centimeters to meters and the implications of using different values for gravitational acceleration.

Discussion Status

Multiple interpretations of the calculations are being explored, with some participants confirming each other's results while others point out potential errors related to unit conversion. Guidance has been offered regarding significant figures and the importance of consistent units.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that the distances provided in the problem are in centimeters, which affects the calculations. There is also mention of using different values for gravitational acceleration, which may lead to discrepancies in the results.

paulimerci
Messages
287
Reaction score
47
Homework Statement
A triangle is suspended from the center of mass located at point O and has four 2 Kg mass suspended at
points A, B, C and D. The angles to points A, B, C and D are measured from the horizontal through the
center of mass where θA = 30 ̊ below, θB = 20 ̊ below, θC = 60 ̊ above and
θD = 80 ̊ above. The distances from point O to points A, B, C, and D are
20 cm, 35 cm, 15 cm and 30 cm respectively. Determine the net torque
acting about the center of mass.
Relevant Equations
T = F × r × sinθ
Net torque = 2gx20xcos30 - 2gx35xcos20 - 2gx15xcos60 + 2gx30xcos80
= -357Nm
Have I done it right?
 

Attachments

  • Screen Shot 2022-10-30 at 6.07.18 AM.png
    Screen Shot 2022-10-30 at 6.07.18 AM.png
    15.2 KB · Views: 145
Physics news on Phys.org
It seems correct to me.
I got 3.50 N-m clockwise, by using g=9.81
I would have written 2g as a common factor.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: paulimerci
Lnewqban said:
It seems correct to me.
I got 350.4 N-m clockwise, by using g=9.81
I would have written 2g as a common factor.
Thank you!
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Lnewqban
Remember the distances are given in cm, not metres.

(Edit- original message deleted.)
 
Steve4Physics said:
Remember the distances are given in cm, not metres.
Thanks, yes I should have done that. I used g = 10m/s2. And I did factoring out 2g in my worksheet but didn't include in the equation above.
 
paulimerci said:
Thanks, yes I should have done that. I used g = 10m/s2. And I did factoring out 2g in my worksheet but didn't include in the equation above.
Hi @paulimerci. If you haven't already spotted it, note that your answer (357Nm) is 100 times too big (because you haven't converted cm to metres).

Also, the data are supplied to 1 or 2 significant figures. Giving the final answer to more than 2 significant figures isn’t good practice.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Lnewqban
Thanks for pointing out, hope I should not do this mistake again.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Steve4Physics
Steve4Physics said:
Remember the distances are given in cm, not metres.

(Edit- original message deleted.)
Thank you, I have edited post #2.
Then, I got 3.50 N-m clockwise.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: paulimerci

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
960
Replies
43
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
1K
Replies
30
Views
4K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
3K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K