Determine the net torque acting about the center of mass

In summary, when calculating the net torque, the formula is 2gx20xcos30 - 2gx35xcos20 - 2gx15xcos60 + 2gx30xcos80 and the result is -357 Nm. However, it is important to remember to convert the distances given in centimeters to meters and to use the correct value for acceleration due to gravity. It is also recommended to round the final answer to 2 significant figures.
  • #1
paulimerci
287
47
Homework Statement
A triangle is suspended from the center of mass located at point O and has four 2 Kg mass suspended at
points A, B, C and D. The angles to points A, B, C and D are measured from the horizontal through the
center of mass where θA = 30 ̊ below, θB = 20 ̊ below, θC = 60 ̊ above and
θD = 80 ̊ above. The distances from point O to points A, B, C, and D are
20 cm, 35 cm, 15 cm and 30 cm respectively. Determine the net torque
acting about the center of mass.
Relevant Equations
T = F × r × sinθ
Net torque = 2gx20xcos30 - 2gx35xcos20 - 2gx15xcos60 + 2gx30xcos80
= -357Nm
Have I done it right?
 

Attachments

  • Screen Shot 2022-10-30 at 6.07.18 AM.png
    Screen Shot 2022-10-30 at 6.07.18 AM.png
    15.2 KB · Views: 97
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
It seems correct to me.
I got 3.50 N-m clockwise, by using g=9.81
I would have written 2g as a common factor.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes paulimerci
  • #3
Lnewqban said:
It seems correct to me.
I got 350.4 N-m clockwise, by using g=9.81
I would have written 2g as a common factor.
Thank you!
 
  • Like
Likes Lnewqban
  • #4
Remember the distances are given in cm, not metres.

(Edit- original message deleted.)
 
  • #5
Steve4Physics said:
Remember the distances are given in cm, not metres.
Thanks, yes I should have done that. I used g = 10m/s2. And I did factoring out 2g in my worksheet but didn't include in the equation above.
 
  • #6
paulimerci said:
Thanks, yes I should have done that. I used g = 10m/s2. And I did factoring out 2g in my worksheet but didn't include in the equation above.
Hi @paulimerci. If you haven't already spotted it, note that your answer (357Nm) is 100 times too big (because you haven't converted cm to metres).

Also, the data are supplied to 1 or 2 significant figures. Giving the final answer to more than 2 significant figures isn’t good practice.
 
  • Like
Likes Lnewqban
  • #7
Thanks for pointing out, hope I should not do this mistake again.
 
  • Like
Likes Steve4Physics
  • #8
Steve4Physics said:
Remember the distances are given in cm, not metres.

(Edit- original message deleted.)
Thank you, I have edited post #2.
Then, I got 3.50 N-m clockwise.
 
  • Like
Likes paulimerci
Back
Top