Determine the range of a function using parameter differentiation

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on determining the range of the function f(x) using parameter differentiation and the Leibniz rule. The derivative f' is derived as an integral involving e^{-t^2x} and includes terms that depend on x, leading to some confusion regarding the coefficients. Participants suggest breaking the integral into parts to simplify differentiation and clarify the application of the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus. The conversation also touches on finding a suitable function g(t) to justify differentiation under the integral sign for a related function. Ultimately, the range of f(x) is concluded to be (0, ln(2)).
schniefen
Messages
177
Reaction score
4
Homework Statement
Determine the range of ##f(x)## for ##x>0## using differentiation under the integral sign.
Relevant Equations
##f(x)=\int_x^{2x} (\frac{e^{-t^2x}}{t}) \ dt ## for ##x>0##.
The strategy here would probably be to find a differential equation that ##f## satisfies, but differentiating with respect to ##x## using Leibniz rule yields

##f'=\int_x^{2x} (-te^{-t^2x}) \ dt + \frac{2e^{-4x^3}-e^{-x^3}}{x}##​

Continuing to differentiate will yield the integral term again (with ##t^3## instead of ##-t##) together with the derivative of the second term above. Is this the right strategy?

As a bonus question. Consider the function ##4t^2e^{-t^2}\cos{(2xt)}##. This is the second derivative w.r.t. ##x## of the function ##e^{-t^2}\cos{(2xt)}##. Now see the attached image. How does one find a function ##g(t)## that satisfies the inequality in the theorem stated in order to justify the differentiation under the integral sign? (##t## ranges from ##0## to ##\infty## and ##x\in\textbf{R}##)

IMG_3112.jpg
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
schniefen said:
Homework Statement: Determine the range of ##f(x)## for ##x>0## using differentiation under the integral sign.
Homework Equations: ##f(x)=\int_x^{2x} (\frac{e^{-t^2x}}{t}) \ dt ## for ##x>0##.

The strategy here would probably be to find a differential equation that ##f## satisfies, but differentiating with respect to ##x## using Leibniz rule yields

##f'=\int_x^{2x} (-te^{-t^2x}) \ dt + \frac{e^{-4x^3}-e^{-x^3}}{x}##
You're making this harder than it needs to be. Finding the derivative is a fairly straightforward application of the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus, one part of which says that
$$\frac d {dx}\int_a^x f(t) dt = f(x)$$
The problem is slightly more complicated in that the integral has functions of x in both of the limits of integration. In this case, you can break up the integral like so:
$$\int_x^{2x} f(t) dt = \int_x^a f(t)dt + \int_a^{2x}f(t)dt$$
schniefen said:
Continuing to differentiate will yield the integral term again (with ##t^3## instead of ##-t##) together with the derivative of the second term above. Is this the right strategy?

As a bonus question. Consider the function ##4t^2e^{-t^2}\cos{(2xt)}##. This is the second derivative w.r.t. ##x## of the function ##e^{-t^2}\cos{(2xt)}##. Now see the attached image. How does one find a function ##g(t)## that satisfies the inequality in the theorem stated in order to justify the differentiation under the integral sign? (##t## ranges from ##0## to ##\infty## and ##x\in\textbf{R}##)

View attachment 251163
 
Last edited:
But breaking up the integral still yields

##f'=\int_x^{2x} (-te^{-t^2x}) \ dt + \frac{2e^{-4x^3}-e^{-x^3}}{x}##
, correct?
 
Last edited:
There seems to be something strange with having an x as both a limit of integration as well as inside of the expression you are integrating.
 
schniefen said:
But breaking up the integral still yields

##f'=\int_x^{2x} (-te^{-t^2x}) \ dt + \frac{2e^{-4x^3}-e^{-x^3}}{x}##
, correct?
That's close to but not the same as what I'm getting. In the Liebniz rule, the integrand, f(x, t), is ##\frac{e^{-t^2x}} t##.
What is f(x, b(x))?
What is f(x, a(x))?
What is ##\frac{\partial}{\partial x}f(x, t)##?
In the above, f is different from what you're using to represent the integral.
 
Mark44 said:
That's close to but not the same as what I'm getting. In the Liebniz rule, the integrand, f(x, t), is ##\frac{e^{-t^2x}} t##.
What is f(x, b(x))?
What is f(x, a(x))?
What is ##\frac{\partial}{\partial x}f(x, t)##?
In the above, f is different from what you're using to represent the integral.
##f(x, b(x))=\frac{e^{-4x^3}}{2x}## (the ##2## in the denominator is eliminated in the Leibniz rule since ##b'(x)=2##
##f(x,a(x))=\frac{e^{-x^3}}{x}##
##\frac{\partial}{\partial x}f(x, t)=(-te^{-t^2x}) ##
 
schniefen said:
But breaking up the integral still yields

##f'=\int_x^{2x} (-te^{-t^2x}) \ dt + \frac{2e^{-4x^3}-e^{-x^3}}{x}##
, correct?
Wouldn't it be ##f'=\int_x^{2x} (-te^{-t^2x}) \ dt + \frac{e^{-4x^3}-e^{-x^3}}{x}##?
IOW, shouldn't the coefficient of the ##e^{-4x^3}## be 1 instead of 2?
 
Correct!
 
Mark44 said:
Wouldn't it be ##f'=\int_x^{2x} (-te^{-t^2x}) \ dt + \frac{e^{-4x^3}-e^{-x^3}}{x}##?
IOW, shouldn't the coefficient of the ##e^{-4x^3}## be 1 instead of 2?
Where would one go from here?
 
  • #10
The integral can be evaluated, treating x in the integrand as if it were constant. The substitution u(t) = -t^2x, give du = -2txdt. Find a "t" antiderivative of the integrand, and then evaluate it at the two limits of integration. Once this is done, maybe you can say something about f, due to f' being zero, or positive, or negative.
 
  • Like
Likes schniefen
  • #11
Using u-substitution and adding the other terms to the evaluated integral,

##f'(x)= \frac{3e^{-4x^3}-3e^{-x^3}}{2x}##
The range should be ##(0,\ln{(2)})##. The expression seems kind of challenging to integrate.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
6K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
2K
Replies
20
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K