How can I determine a parabola given two points?

  • Thread starter Thread starter dtl42
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Parabola
AI Thread Summary
To determine a parabola given two points, it's essential to recognize that two points alone are insufficient to uniquely define the coefficients a, b, and c in the general form y = ax^2 + bx + c. By substituting the coordinates of the two points into the equation, simultaneous equations can be formed, but these will not yield a unique solution due to the existence of multiple parabolas passing through the same points. Additional information about the parabola, such as its vertex or direction, is necessary to narrow down the possibilities. If no extra conditions are provided, any solution to the equations can represent a valid parabola. Thus, without further constraints, one can only find a family of parabolas rather than a single explicit equation.
dtl42
Messages
118
Reaction score
0
If given two arbitrary points on a parabola, is there anyway to determine an explicit equation for that parabola. I know there are multiple possible parabolas, but how can I find just one of them?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
the general form of a parabola is y=ax^2 +bx+c

so given two points on the parabola, that would be insufficient to find a,b and c. If there is something else given about those 2 points then you may be able to find it.
 
If given two points, and you want the family of parabolas to go through them, just substitute those points into the general form of a parabola and you should get some simultaneous equations. You won't able able to get unique solutions for them, as you know, because there are many parabolas that go through those 2 points. If you want just any, choose any solution to the equations.
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top