Determining Galois extension based on degree of extension

  • Thread starter Thread starter PsychonautQQ
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Degree Extension
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

In the discussion, it is established that if the characteristic of field K is 0 and the degree of extension [L:K] equals 2, then L:K is indeed a Galois extension. The reasoning is based on the properties of minimal polynomials, where a polynomial in K[x] with a root in L must split in L[x]. Given that the minimal polynomial has degree 2, it factors linearly in L, confirming that the extension is normal and separable. The separability is guaranteed by the characteristic of K being 0, ensuring all roots are contained within K(u).

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Galois theory and extensions
  • Familiarity with minimal polynomials and their properties
  • Knowledge of field characteristics, specifically characteristic 0
  • Basic concepts of linear independence in vector spaces
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the implications of Galois extensions in field theory
  • Learn about the structure of minimal polynomials in algebra
  • Explore the concept of separability in field extensions
  • Investigate examples of Galois extensions and their applications
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, algebra students, and anyone studying field theory or Galois theory will benefit from this discussion, particularly those interested in the properties of extensions and minimal polynomials.

PsychonautQQ
Messages
781
Reaction score
10

Homework Statement


If Char(K) = 0 and [L:K]=2, is L:K a galois extension?

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


My gut is saying yes because if [L:K]=2 then it seems that any polynomial in K[x] with a root in L should split in L[x]. Something about how some hypothetical minimal polynomial of some element m call it m(x) where L[x] is isomorphic to the quotient field K[x]/m(x), then K(u) is isomorphic to L where given the conditions that [L:K] =2 then deg(m(x)) = 2 and so if L has one of the roots of m(x) then that means that m(x) factors linearly because it only has degree 2 and thus all the roots are in L thus the extension is normal. Am I leaving anything important out?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I've thought along the same lines. More formal we can choose an element ##u \in L-K##. Then ##\{1,u\}## is ##K-##linear independent and ##\{1,u,u^2\}## is not. This means we can write ##u^2=\alpha \cdot 1 + \beta \cdot u## which means ##u## is a root of ##x^2- \beta x - \alpha##.
Now we can write down both solutions ##u## and ##v## and see that ##v \in K(u)##, i.e. our minimal polynomial splits and is separable. (Why?)
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: PsychonautQQ
fresh_42 said:
I've thought along the same lines. More formal we can choose an element ##u \in L-K##. Then ##\{1,u\}## is ##K-##linear independent and ##\{1,u,u^2\}## is not. This means we can write ##u^2=\alpha \cdot 1 + \beta \cdot u## which means ##u## is a root of ##x^2- \beta x - \alpha##.
Now we can write down both solutions ##u## and ##v## and see that ##v \in K(u)##, i.e. our minimal polynomial splits and is separable. (Why?)
Our minimal polynomial is separable because K is given to have Characteristic 0, and our minimal polynomial splits because both of it's roots are in K(u). Thanks!
 
PsychonautQQ said:
Our minimal polynomial is separable because K is given to have Characteristic 0, and our minimal polynomial splits because both of it's roots are in K(u). Thanks!
One can also see it directly: If ##u## were a double root, then ##u=-\frac{\beta}{2} \in K## which we ruled out. And with ##u=-\frac{\beta}{2}-\sqrt{sth.}\, , \,v=-\frac{\beta}{2}+\sqrt{sth.}## we get ##v=-u-\beta \in K(u)##.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K