Prove an extension is not normal

  • Thread starter Thread starter PsychonautQQ
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Extension Normal
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The extension Q(b):Q, where b is a square root of 1+i, is proven to be non-normal due to the minimal polynomial x^4+4, which has roots that are not entirely contained within Q(b). Specifically, the roots include ±√2 and ±(1+i), indicating that the extension lacks the necessary roots for normality. The Galois group of the extension is isomorphic to Z_2 x Z_2, reflecting the permutation of the roots of the polynomial.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of field extensions and normality in algebra
  • Familiarity with minimal polynomials and their properties
  • Knowledge of Galois theory and Galois groups
  • Basic complex number operations and their implications in field theory
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of minimal polynomials in field extensions
  • Learn about Galois groups and their structure in relation to field extensions
  • Explore examples of non-normal extensions in algebra
  • Investigate the relationship between roots of unity and field extensions
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, particularly those specializing in algebra and number theory, as well as students studying field theory and Galois theory.

PsychonautQQ
Messages
781
Reaction score
10

Homework Statement


let b be a square root of 1+i, show that Q(b):Q is not a normal extension. Also, what is the Galois group of the extension?

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


so b = +/- (1+i)^(1/2), and it's minimal polynomial is x^4+4 which has roots -(2)^1/2 and 2^(1/2) that are not in Q(b) and therefore the extension is not normal. In a proper splitting field, x^4+4 splits into (x-(1+i))(x+(1+i))(x-2^(1/2))(x+2^(1/2)), the Galois group would have a map that permutes the roots of the first two factors and a map that would permute the roots of the second two factors, therefore it would be isomorphic to Z_2 x Z_2.

Is this correct?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
PsychonautQQ said:
it's minimal polynomial is x^4+4
That doesn't look right to me.

We have ##b^2=1+i## so that ##b^2-1=i## so that ##(b^2-1)^2=-1##. Hence a monic 4th degree polynomial with root ##b## is ##(x^2-1)^2+1=x^4-2x^2+2##. Since the minimal polynomial is unique, I don't think your polynomial can also be minimal.

The structure of your argument is otherwise OK. There will be four roots of the minimal polynomial, two of which are in ##\mathbb Q(b)## and two of which are not.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: PsychonautQQ
On the second part of the question, you appear to have found the Galois group of the extension that includes the other two roots of that minimal polynomial, which is not what was asked. Nor will the Galois group just be ##\mathbb Z_2##. This part of this question has many similarities to that earlier one you asked about an extension based on ##c##, a primitive fourteenth root of 1. Here the extension is based on ##b##, a primitive 16th root of ##2^8##.

Remember how each fixing automorphism in that other example mapped ##c## to ##c^k## where ##k\geq 1## and ##k\leq## (did you ever end up working out what the upper limit was?).

Well here the same thing will apply. Each fixing automorphism will map ##b## to a positive integer power of ##b##, up to a certain upper limit.

If you can solve that other problem, including finding that upper limit, you can solve this one.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: PsychonautQQ

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
2K