Determining pH of Solution: 2 Acid Mix with HCl and CH3COOH

  • Thread starter Thread starter firyace
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Acids Ph
AI Thread Summary
To determine the pH of a solution containing both HCl and CH3COOH, the contribution of H+ from HCl is negligible due to its low concentration. The initial pH of the HCl solution would be around 7.00 without acetic acid. For the acetic acid, a regular equilibrium calculation can be performed using its dissociation constant (Ka). The confusion arises from the total volume of the mixed solution, which is stated as 50 mL instead of 60 mL. Ultimately, HCl can be neglected in the calculations due to its minimal impact on the overall pH.
firyace
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
Hi, I got a problem with something regarding to chemistry. How can you determine the pH of a solution with two Acids?

The question says that A 50.00 mL aqueous solution is made by mixing the following two solutions:

10.00mL 1x10^-9M HCl

50.00mL 1*10^-4 M CH3COOH (Ka= 1.8*10^-5)

a) What is the Cl^- in the 50.00mL solution?
b)What is the pH in the 50mL solution?
c) What is the [CH3COOH] in the 50mL solution?


thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
In general it is difficult to calculate pH of such solution, but here... Look at the concentration of hydrochloric acid. What pH does it have without acetic acid?
 
This is my guess (please take this lightly):

The contribution of H+ from the HCl will be negligible compared to the contribution from water, which would make the pH of the first solution 7.00. To figure out the pH of the other solution, just do a regular equilibrium problem using the acetic acid. The initial H+ concentration will be 1.0 x 10^-9, but I don't think it will matter because it's negligible.

Note: I'm confused as to why the question says that a 50 mL solution is formed instead of a 60 mL solution...
 
You are correct on both accounts - pH and volume ;)
 
So now I am confused, do I just neglect the HCl totally because that the concentration is neglegible?

'm confused as to why the question says that a 50 mL solution is formed instead of a 60 mL solution...
Yesterday 06:30 AM
:bugeye: that is what it said for the question.
 
firyace said:
So now I am confused, do I just neglect the HCl totally because that the concentration is neglegible?

Yes.
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top