Determining Sun-Earth Distance: Parallax vs. Kepler's Law

  • Thread starter Thread starter Zman
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Earth Sun
AI Thread Summary
The current method for determining the distance from the Earth to the Sun primarily utilizes radar technology, particularly by measuring the time it takes for radar pulses to bounce back from Venus during close approaches. While parallax measurements involving Mars can also provide insights, they are not the most accurate method used today. Kepler's third law is applied alongside these measurements to calculate the Earth-Sun distance based on the orbital periods of the planets. Additionally, the mass of the Earth can be determined through lunar observations, contributing to the overall understanding of celestial distances. Radar remains the most precise technique for measuring the astronomical unit (AU) today.
Zman
Messages
96
Reaction score
0
How is the sun Earth distance currently determined?

I read about a method where the distance between the Earth and Mars is determined when they are in opposition using parallax.
Knowing the orbit period of both Mars and the earth, Kepler’s third law is then used to determine the Earth sun distance.

Is this method seen as the best or is a different method used?
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
I do not know if that's the best, but I think there another way.
First we can calculate the mass of the Earth via the period of the Moon and its distance from the Earth. Then identify the angular velocity of the Earth around the Sun by directing to the faraway galaxies or stars at exactly one moment at night, say at 0:00
 
Thanks D H for the reference to the Quest for the AU article. The history was very interesting and it answered my question which is that Radar is the technique used today.
Its only about 5 mins for the radar pulse to return from venus at closest approach.
 
Publication: Redox-driven mineral and organic associations in Jezero Crater, Mars Article: NASA Says Mars Rover Discovered Potential Biosignature Last Year Press conference The ~100 authors don't find a good way this could have formed without life, but also can't rule it out. Now that they have shared their findings with the larger community someone else might find an explanation - or maybe it was actually made by life.
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'
This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...
Back
Top