MHB Determining the Maximum and Minimum of a Discontinuous Function $f(x,y)$

  • Thread starter Thread starter mathmari
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Maximum Minimum
mathmari
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
4,984
Reaction score
7
Hey! :o

We have the function $f: (\mathbb{R}^2,\|\cdot\|_2)\rightarrow (\mathbb{R},|\cdot |)$ with \begin{equation*}f(x,y)=\begin{cases}y-x & y\geq x^2 \\ 0 & y<x^2\end{cases}\end{equation*}

I have shown that $f(x,y)$ is discontinuous at the points $(x,x^2)$ with $x\neq 0,1$ and continuous at the other points, i.e. at the points $(x,y)$ with $y<x^2$ and $y>x^2$, and also at the points $(0,0)$ and $(1,1)$.

Now I want to determine the maximum and minimum of $f$, if they exist. When $y\geq x^2$ we have that $f(x,y)=y-x\geq x^2-x\geq -\frac{1}{4}$.
($-\frac{1}{4}$ is the minimum of $x^2-x$ at $x=\frac{1}{2}$)
Since $-\frac{1}{4}$ is smaller than $0$ (the value of the function when $y<x^2$) it follows that the function $f(x,y)$ has a minimum at $(x,y)=(x,x^2)=\left (\frac{1}{2}, \frac{1}{4}\right )$ which is equal to $-\frac{1}{4}$.

Is this correct? If yes, could we improve the justification? (Wondering) About the maximum: In the first case, $y$ is greater than $x^2$, so I think that the value of the function can grow infinitely, i.e. it has no maximum. Is this correct? But how could we justify that formally? (Wondering)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
mathmari said:
Hey! :o

We have the function $f: (\mathbb{R}^2,\|\cdot\|_2)\rightarrow (\mathbb{R},|\cdot |)$ with \begin{equation*}f(x,y)=\begin{cases}y-x & y\geq x^2 \\ 0 & y<x^2\end{cases}\end{equation*}

I have shown that $f(x,y)$ is discontinuous at the points $(x,x^2)$ with $x\neq 0,1$ and continuous at the other points, i.e. at the points $(x,y)$ with $y<x^2$ and $y>x^2$, and also at the points $(0,0)$ and $(1,1)$.

Now I want to determine the maximum and minimum of $f$, if they exist. When $y\geq x^2$ we have that $f(x,y)=y-x\geq x^2-x\geq -\frac{1}{4}$.
($-\frac{1}{4}$ is the minimum of $x^2-x$ at $x=\frac{1}{2}$)
Since $-\frac{1}{4}$ is smaller than $0$ (the value of the function when $y<x^2$) it follows that the function $f(x,y)$ has a minimum at $(x,y)=(x,x^2)=\left (\frac{1}{2}, \frac{1}{4}\right )$ which is equal to $-\frac{1}{4}$.

Is this correct? If yes, could we improve the justification? (Wondering) About the maximum: In the first case, $y$ is greater than $x^2$, so I think that the value of the function can grow infinitely, i.e. it has no maximum. Is this correct? But how could we justify that formally? (Wondering)
Your answers are correct. The minimum is $-\frac14$, at the point $\left (\frac{1}{2}, \frac{1}{4}\right )$. To show that there is no maximum, notice that $f(0,y) = y$ for all $y\geqslant0$.
 
Opalg said:
Your answers are correct. The minimum is $-\frac14$, at the point $\left (\frac{1}{2}, \frac{1}{4}\right )$. To show that there is no maximum, notice that $f(0,y) = y$ for all $y\geqslant0$.

Ah ok! Thank you very much! (Yes)
 
A sphere as topological manifold can be defined by gluing together the boundary of two disk. Basically one starts assigning each disk the subspace topology from ##\mathbb R^2## and then taking the quotient topology obtained by gluing their boundaries. Starting from the above definition of 2-sphere as topological manifold, shows that it is homeomorphic to the "embedded" sphere understood as subset of ##\mathbb R^3## in the subspace topology.
Back
Top