Diameter diff between flow pipe and component connector

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the sizing of pipes in relation to the inlet sizes of components, such as fancoils and pumps, particularly focusing on the implications of pressure drop and flow dynamics. It examines the rationale behind using different pipe diameters leading to component inlets and the potential consequences of such choices.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions the logic of having a larger pipe diameter (1 1/2") leading to a smaller component inlet (1") and suggests that pressure drop might be a factor.
  • Another participant cautions against basing pipe size solely on the inlet size of components, noting that many installations may have specific reasons for their configurations.
  • A different viewpoint emphasizes that while pumps may require different considerations due to their role in increasing flow, components that simply allow water to flow through should logically have pipe sizes based on their inlets.
  • One participant argues that sizing pipes to match component inlets is an inadequate approach, asserting that the proper conditions for fluid delivery should dictate pipe sizing instead.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing opinions on the appropriate approach to pipe sizing in relation to component inlets, indicating that there is no consensus on the best practice. Some advocate for a more nuanced understanding of system requirements, while others challenge the adequacy of matching pipe sizes to inlets.

Contextual Notes

The discussion highlights the complexity of fluid dynamics in piping systems and the potential for varying interpretations of best practices based on specific installation conditions. Assumptions about pressure drop and flow conditions remain unresolved.

TSN79
Messages
422
Reaction score
0
So many places I've seen components (fancoils and such) with inlets that are let's say 1", but where the pipe leading up it is maybe 1 1/2". Does that make any sense at all? Can pressure drop have something to do with it?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
I know this was probably just an example, but please, don't fall into the trap that MANY people do which is to base your piping size on the inlet size of a component like a pump. There is indeed a lot of examples out there where people were over generous in their sizing "just to make sure" there won't be a problem.

That being said, every installation is different and may have its reasons for doing so. It may very well be pressure drop. If cost per foot of pipe is not of real concern, then increasing the pipe size to the component is the easiest thing to do.
 
Thx for the quick response :)
With pumps I believe it's a bit different, since they actually increase the flow. But with components where the water just flows through isn't the most logical thing just to just to base the pipe size on the inlet? The only reason I can see not to is if the manufacturer of the component based its pipe size on a much higher pressure drop than what the pipe leading up to it will have.
 
"But with components where the water just flows through isn't the most logical thing just to just to base the pipe size on the inlet?"

No, sizing your pipe to match the component inlet is a lazy, ignorant thing to do, and doing so defies logic. The "most logical thing" is to get the fluid to the inlet at the proper conditions. The component vendor has no idea whatsoever what your system looks like, or what you have to do to meet his assumed inlet conditions.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
5K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
0
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K