I Uncovering the Truth: Jupiter's Core Revealed as Solid Diamond by Tammy Ma

AI Thread Summary
Tammy Ma's recent article in Scientific American claims that Jupiter's core is a solid diamond, supported by her laser experiments. However, there is skepticism regarding the validity of this claim, with some participants noting a lack of published evidence and general acceptance within the scientific community. The idea of a diamond core has been considered a possibility but remains unproven. Questions arise about how this model aligns with gravity measurements from NASA's Juno mission, which may contradict the existence of a pure solid core. Overall, while the concept is intriguing, it requires further substantiation to gain wider acceptance.
KevinMcHugh
Messages
32
Reaction score
10
TL;DR Summary
Title says it all.
In a recent Scientific American article, Tammy Ma claims Jupiters core is solid diamond. She claims her work with lasers has demonstrated this. Any thoughts?
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
KevinMcHugh said:
In a recent Scientific American article, Tammy Ma claims Jupiters core is solid diamond. She claims her work with lasers has demonstrated this. Any thoughts?
My though is that when you ask about an article, you should post a link to the article.
 
  • Like
Likes Dragrath, DaveE, berkeman and 1 other person
How do I do that, I'm an old fossil.
 
  • Like
Likes hagopbul
KevinMcHugh said:
How do I do that, I'm an old fossil.
Go to the web page where you read this. Click-Drag to copy the address (starts with "http://" or similar) in the address bar of your browser, and paste it into a reply here.

Also, it's best if you can find where in the article they link to the original peer-reviewed article, please also post a copy of that link here. We prefer to read the original paper, rather than the popoular press' interpretation of the scientific paper. Thanks. :smile:
 
  • Like
Likes Dragrath, Bystander, phinds and 1 other person
I read the same idea (diamond core of a gas giant) in a some Arthur C. Clarke book may years ago.
Doesn't make it science though.
 
  • Like
Likes KevinMcHugh
BillTre said:
I read the same idea (diamond core of a gas giant) in a some Arthur C. Clarke book may years ago.
Doesn't make it science though.
Note, Tammy Ma is a reputable scientist, and the diamond core idea has been considered a possibility worth investigating by many in the field. But what I couldn’t find is any sign of new published evidence, nor of any general acceptance of the idea as anything more than a possibility.
 
  • Like
Likes KevinMcHugh, phinds and BillTre
PAllen said:
Note, Tammy Ma is a reputable scientist, and the diamond core idea has been considered a possibility worth investigating by many in the field. But what I couldn’t find is any sign of new published evidence, nor of any general acceptance of the idea as anything more than a possibility.
How would a "diamond core" model reconcile with the measured gravity harmonics determined by NASA's Juno mission? As far as I can tell those models preclude a pure solid core as presumably needed for a crystalline latice.
 
  • #10
Dragrath said:
How would a "diamond core" model reconcile with the measured gravity harmonics determined by NASA's Juno mission? As far as I can tell those models preclude a pure solid core as presumably needed for a crystalline latice.
This is not a field I know much about. I just did some internet searching because it seemed the OP wasn't going to. I found that the diamond core idea appeared to be taken seriously as a 'possibility' by many in the field, however I cannot speak to the specifics of your question.
 
  • #11
I would expect that gravity is sufficient to deform even a solid core over long distances, just like everywhere else.
 
Back
Top