Did i do this problem right? (Work by Spring and KE)

  • Thread starter Thread starter Lori
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Spring
Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
10 replies · 2K views
Lori

Homework Statement



upload_2017-11-8_13-48-5.png

Homework Equations



W= KE
Wspring = .5kx^2

The Attempt at a Solution


since W = .5mv^2 = Wspring = .5x^2
i solve for v and get that v = sqrt(kx^2/m)
if i plug in multiply the x by 2, the 2 squares and i get 4. the square root of 4 is just 2 and it comes out as a constant , and so velocity is 2 times faster

Did i go through the problem correctly?[/B]
 

Attachments

  • upload_2017-11-8_13-48-5.png
    upload_2017-11-8_13-48-5.png
    33.6 KB · Views: 1,808
Physics news on Phys.org
Lori said:

Homework Statement



View attachment 214618

Homework Equations



W= KE
Wspring = .5kx^2

The Attempt at a Solution


since W = .5mv^2 = Wspring = .5x^2
i solve for v and get that v = sqrt(kx^2/m)
if i plug in multiply the x by 2, the 2 squares and i get 4. the square root of 4 is just 2 and it comes out as a constant , and so velocity is 2 times faster

Did i go through the problem correctly?[/B]

You got the right answer for the right reasons. You might like to think, however, about how you could organise your working better.
 
Lori said:

Homework Statement



View attachment 214618

Homework Equations



W= KE
Wspring = .5kx^2

The Attempt at a Solution


since W = .5mv^2 = Wspring = .5x^2
i solve for v and get that v = sqrt(kx^2/m)
if i plug in multiply the x by 2, the 2 squares and i get 4. the square root of 4 is just 2 and it comes out as a constant , and so velocity is 2 times faster

Did i go through the problem correctly?[/B]
You are right but if you have to write what is relation between heights
 
Abhishek kumar said:
You are right but if you have to write what is relation between heights
mgh + 1/2mv^2=PE of Spring + mgh
mgh + 1/2mv^2 = .5kx^2 + 0
mgh + .5mv^2 = .5k(2x)^2
mgh + .5mv^2 =4 (.5kx^2)

since m and g are constant in the left side of the equation, the coefficient 4 will affect the height and the speed of the object and the final KE
height will be 4 times as big and the velocity would be twice as fast at final, while the final KE will times 4
 
Lori said:
mgh + 1/2mv^2=PE of Spring + mgh
mgh + 1/2mv^2 = .5kx^2 + 0
mgh + .5mv^2 = .5k(2x)^2
mgh + .5mv^2 =4 (.5kx^2)
height will be 4 times as big and the velocity would be twice as fast at final
When block will reach its maximum height velocity will be zero at that instant simply applying energy conservation at that instant you will get the result
 
Abhishek kumar said:
When block will reach its maximum height velocity will be zero at that instant simply applying energy conservation at that instant you will get the result
How would you write the equation?

How is the one I wrote above incorrect?

In energy conservation E2 = E1

(Final energy) PE2 + KE2 = PE + KE1 (initial energy)
 
Lori said:
How would you write the equation?

How is the one I wrote above incorrect?

In energy conservation E2 = E1

(Final energy) PE2 + KE2 = PE + KE1 (initial energy)
When block reach max height at that instant velocity seized and no kinetic energy
. 5kx^2=mgh
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Lori
haruspex said:
Ceased.
Thank you for correcting me
 
Abhishek kumar said:
Thank you for correcting me
Oh I see. So in this spring problem. The initial energy comes from PE of spring.

The final energy comes from the gravitational energy since kinetic energy is 0 (because the object stops)
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Abhishek kumar
Lori said:
Oh I see. So in this spring problem. The initial energy comes from PE of spring.

The final energy comes from the gravitational energy since kinetic energy is 0 (because the object stops)[
Lori said:
Oh I see. So in this spring problem. The initial energy comes from PE of spring.

The final energy comes from the gravitational energy since kinetic energy is 0 (because the object stops)
Yes you got it