Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

News Did Iran Sustain a Cyber Attack?

  1. Sep 24, 2010 #1

    lisab

    User Avatar
    Staff Emeritus
    Science Advisor
    Gold Member

    There's been speculation surrounding the "Stuxnet" worm for some time. Now the Christian Science Monitor (and others) are reporting the worm may have been targeted specifically to hit Iran's Bushehr nuclear power plant, or perhaps its Natanz nuclear centrifuge facility.

    It blows my mind that Iran surrounded Bushehr with missiles, but allowed contractors to freely use USB memory sticks - apparently how the worm spreads.

    It's an amazing article, a modern 'who dunnit?' which sounds like it's straight out of a Clancy novel.

    http://www.csmonitor.com/USA/2010/0924/Stuxnet-worm-mystery-What-s-the-cyber-weapon-after

    http://www.symantec.com/connect/blogs/stuxnet-introduces-first-known-rootkit-scada-devices
     
    Last edited by a moderator: Apr 25, 2017
  2. jcsd
  3. Sep 25, 2010 #2

    Borek

    User Avatar

    Staff: Mentor

    And then we think Ahmadinejad is a crackpot...
     
  4. Sep 25, 2010 #3
    Cyberspace is naturally becoming a target for espionage.

    Assuming this is due to the efforts of the CIA, or NSA, or what-have-you, was it a success mission, or bumbled probing that became noticed?
     
  5. Sep 25, 2010 #4

    lisab

    User Avatar
    Staff Emeritus
    Science Advisor
    Gold Member

    Well Bushehr was supposed to be up and running but it isn't, and they haven't told why. Also the centrifuge facility had several failures at the time this worm was active (according to the article, it had a halt date). So...maybe the attack was successful, but Iran certainly won't affirm that.

    Your list of possible perpetrators is a good start...I'd add Israel, I think.
     
  6. Sep 25, 2010 #5
    Could it not be a case of the combined resources of the Wetern world's intelligence agencies failing where one maverick with the ability to write worm viruses succeeded?
     
  7. Sep 25, 2010 #6
    Maybe, a lot of wizzkids act alone, doing incredible things, anyway I read:

    I have no idea why this was included in the writing. Could be suggestive of more hyperbole, missiles going off and hitting targets whereever, steered by the worm. The article does not state anything like that, but that interpretation is certainly not discouraged.

    Maybe that the reporter had asked about such an scenario and got an 'don-t-worry' answer that he did not like, so he may have excluded that.

    So let me give that don't-worry answer.

    Air defense missiles are designed just to do that, with a limited range to strike air targets, also with a rather limited payload, a few kilograms rather than tonnes. This makes them virtually incapable of hostile action against groundtargets at longer range than one or two hunderd kilometers. Most point defence weapons are in the dozen kilometer order of magnitude range, if not less.

    Just my two cents.
     
  8. Sep 25, 2010 #7

    Office_Shredder

    User Avatar
    Staff Emeritus
    Science Advisor
    Gold Member

    It's supposed to give you the impression that the place is bristling with defenses, and is intended to be impervious, except there's a gaping backdoor.
     
  9. Sep 25, 2010 #8

    Borek

    User Avatar

    Staff: Mentor

    That's how I read it.
     
  10. Sep 25, 2010 #9

    Ivan Seeking

    User Avatar
    Staff Emeritus
    Science Advisor
    Gold Member

    I think this is funny! We have been worried about the grid and defensive systems for a long time now. I forget how many cyber attacks the Pentagon fends off each day, but it's a big number. The notion that this same threat could keep ole looney toons in check for a time, is downright poetic.

    It reminds a bit of the homing beacons that we hid in printers sold to Saddam - printers that we knew were going to defensive facilities! When the first Gulf War broke out, we just activated the beacons remotely and keyed missiles to the signals from the beacons.
     
    Last edited: Sep 25, 2010
  11. Sep 25, 2010 #10
    that's the obvious point. missed by some.
     
    Last edited by a moderator: Sep 25, 2010
  12. Sep 25, 2010 #11

    Hurkyl

    User Avatar
    Staff Emeritus
    Science Advisor
    Gold Member

    It's only obvious to those who find it obvious. :wink: When one doesn't say what one means, there is always the danger the meaning will get lost.
     
  13. Sep 25, 2010 #12
    agreed. sorry if it seemed judgemental.
     
  14. Sep 26, 2010 #13

    Borek

    User Avatar

    Staff: Mentor

    Don't forget English is not a first language to many of PF posters, sometimes unexpected subtleties work against our understanding of seemingly obvious statements.
     
  15. Sep 26, 2010 #14
    Cool! It's about time someone other than our DOD, State Department or LANL gets cyberattacked!
     
    Last edited by a moderator: Apr 25, 2017
  16. Sep 26, 2010 #15
    I was waiting for someone to point out that we're just about as dumbly unprepared as most other nations in this arena.

    I for one have no problem believing that this was the work of one person, or a small group of hackers or even script-kiddies with a bit of experience. Hell, it could even be a pissed of Iranian national or ex-pat with time and an education.
     
  17. Sep 26, 2010 #16

    lisab

    User Avatar
    Staff Emeritus
    Science Advisor
    Gold Member

    I'm not so sure it's a single person or even a small group. Apparently the worm seeks a very specific process control fingerprint, made only by Siemens*. Once it recognizes the fingerprint, it launches and re-writes the process control software. That's pretty specific knowledge.

    *I'm not sure if Siemens also uses that process control code for other industrial processes. If it's specific to nuclear reactors, that makes it even more likely that it was written by a nation state.
     
  18. Sep 26, 2010 #17
    Or someone who works or worked for Siemens. Never underestimate the power of a pissed-off employee.
     
  19. Sep 26, 2010 #18
    I have read one thing the Chinese do is have whole specialized teams of elite hackers work together. And not just one team either. They'll have a team for one part of a major hack, then another team handle another part of the hack, and so on; this they believe is how the Chinese stole all sorts of information from some major American corporations without said corporations even being aware at first.
     
  20. Sep 26, 2010 #19

    CRGreathouse

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Homework Helper

    Do you think this is unusual amongst major nations?
     
  21. Sep 26, 2010 #20
    ...and here I thought the NSA was just there for show! *facepalm*

    Then again, CAC1001 isn't wrong, china does in fact do just what he said. He's just... selective in his view.
     
Share this great discussion with others via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook