Did PF wipe out old userswho didn't post?

  • Thread starter Thread starter On Radioactive Waves
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around a user expressing confusion about their registration status on a forum, questioning whether there was a significant change or server update that affected memberships. It is clarified that all users, both old and new, were required to re-register due to a recent overhaul of the forum's software. The user expresses a sense of belonging and plans to make this forum their new home, especially after feeling disappointed with another platform. The conversation concludes with a mention of the user's intention to catch up on physics homework over the weekend and a warm greeting to the community.
On Radioactive Waves
Messages
136
Reaction score
0
I think I posted once... maybe not. But I was registered, receiving the letter. Can someone clue me in on why I wasn't registered anymore? Was there a major makeover here?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
We recently changed servers?? Or was it just software??

Everyone old and new had to redo their membership.
 
Yes we changed and everyone had to re-do everything, you're right pauly man. Welcome waves!
 
thanks for the welcome... lethe filled me in on what had happened.


I think this will be my new home, since sciforums has majorly gone downhill.

well, i got behind in my physics homework, so I'm off to embark on a physics athon this weekend.

A big hello to everyone at the board!
 
I want to thank those members who interacted with me a couple of years ago in two Optics Forum threads. They were @Drakkith, @hutchphd, @Gleb1964, and @KAHR-Alpha. I had something I wanted the scientific community to know and slipped a new idea in against the rules. Thank you also to @berkeman for suggesting paths to meet with academia. Anyway, I finally got a paper on the same matter as discussed in those forum threads, the fat lens model, got it peer-reviewed, and IJRAP...
This came up in my job today (UXP). Never thought to raise it here on PF till now. Hyperlinks really should be underlined at all times. PF only underlines them when they are rolled over. Colour alone (especially dark blue/purple) makes it difficult to spot a hyperlink in a large block of text (or even a small one). Not everyone can see perfectly. Even if they don't suffer from colour deficiency, not everyone has the visual acuity to distinguish two very close shades of text. Hover actions...
About 20 years ago, in my mid-30s (and with a BA in economics and a master's in business), I started taking night classes in physics hoping to eventually earn the science degree I'd always wanted but never pursued. I found physics forums and used it to ask questions I was unable to get answered from my textbooks or class lectures. Unfortunately, work and life got in the way and I never got further the freshman courses. Well, here it is 20 years later. I'm in my mid-50s now, and in a...

Similar threads

Replies
14
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
359
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
46
Views
10K
Replies
10
Views
3K
Replies
14
Views
2K
Back
Top