Didn't learn simple harmonic motion in physics 1, will this hurt me?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the implications of not having learned simple harmonic motion (SHM) in an introductory physics course at a community college. Participants explore whether this gap in knowledge will affect future studies in mid-level and upper-level physics courses at a four-year university, and whether self-study is advisable to prepare for upcoming coursework.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Homework-related

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses concern that missing SHM may hinder future physics studies, emphasizing its importance in advanced courses.
  • Another participant suggests that self-teaching SHM is feasible, as the material is accessible in standard physics and differential equations textbooks.
  • Some participants share their own experiences of gaps in physics education and how they successfully filled those gaps through self-study and practice problems.
  • There are differing opinions on the quality of instruction at community colleges, with some attributing the lack of coverage in SHM to potential educational malpractice.
  • One participant notes that the pace of the class may have been affected by the number of students dropping out, suggesting that the instructor may have had to adjust the curriculum accordingly.
  • Another participant mentions that SHM is often revisited in higher-level courses, implying that it can be learned later if necessary.
  • Concerns are raised about the adequacy of the Physics for Engineers course compared to the General Physics course, with some participants feeling that the latter does not adequately prepare engineering students.
  • One participant describes their university's unique approach to teaching mechanics and oscillations, indicating that SHM may be covered later in the curriculum.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree that SHM is an important topic in physics, but there is no consensus on whether the lack of exposure will have significant consequences. Multiple competing views exist regarding the adequacy of self-study and the quality of instruction at community colleges.

Contextual Notes

Some participants mention the variability in physics curricula across institutions and the potential for different educational experiences based on course structure and teaching quality.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be useful for students transitioning from community colleges to four-year universities, particularly those concerned about gaps in their physics education and the importance of specific topics like SHM in their future studies.

Jack21222
Messages
209
Reaction score
1
I took calc-based physics 1 last semester, but since it was at a community college, I don't think we went as far as the 4 year universities went. We skipped over simple harmonic motion.

Will this hurt me later on, when I go to mid-level and upper-level physics courses at the 4-year university I'm transferring to? Or, will they re-teach the material at that time?

Should I try to teach myself the material to prepare?

Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Oh...yikes. Sorry to hear that, Jack.

I don't want to sound inflammatory, but you may be the victim of educational malpractice. Yes you really, really, really need SHO...it comes up over and over again in advanced courses.

Somehow, you need to get this information into your foundation. Some people are pretty good at self-teaching; can you do that, you think?

I need to be frank here...if the instructor was so basically incompetent the he/she skipped over this fundamental concept, I wonder how well the rest of the class was taught.

Perhaps you should consider re-taking the class at a different institution...? Just a suggestion. I wish the best for you.
 
All there is in SHM for an introductory mechanics class is the analysis of two differential equations: undamped and damped oscillations. I suppose three if you want to consider one with a driving force, but I'm not sure how many courses do that. At any rate, it's very easy to pick up on your own, seeing as the material is in any physics or differential equations book. Definitely worth teaching yourself.

I echo lisab's concerns though about the quality of the rest of the class if you didn't go over SHM...
 
Definitely teach yourself the material if possible. If you're concerned about whether your background is sufficient, you can always sign up for a more advanced course and the introductory course, and then drop one later in the semester
 
lisab said:
Oh...yikes. Sorry to hear that, Jack.

I don't want to sound inflammatory, but you may be the victim of educational malpractice. Yes you really, really, really need SHO...it comes up over and over again in advanced courses.

Somehow, you need to get this information into your foundation. Some people are pretty good at self-teaching; can you do that, you think?

I need to be frank here...if the instructor was so basically incompetent the he/she skipped over this fundamental concept, I wonder how well the rest of the class was taught.

Perhaps you should consider re-taking the class at a different institution...? Just a suggestion. I wish the best for you.

I'd be quicker to blame the rest of the class than the instructor. Even at the snail's pace he was going, over half the class had dropped by the final, and I was the only A. At least one student I know of actually changed majors altogether because of his difficulties. He went from Engineering to Russian as a major.

Class started out with 21 people, only 10 took the final.

If the class were bigger, he could have left more people behind, and pressed forward with the material, but once the class started approaching single digits, I can't blame him for slowing down. It'd look bad if only 3 people took the final.

Ah, the joys of community college.

Thanks for the responses, I'm pretty sure I can teach myself the material; I'll probably do that this winter.

On a slightly different note: I have the same professor for Physics 2 right now, and the class seems to be moving slightly faster... up to what topic should be covered in Physics 2? Today, we start magnetism, we just finished R-C circuits. Should we get to electromagnetic radiation? We're using the Young and Freedman book, just starting chapter 27, if that helps any.
 
Young and Freedman was my undergraduate bible.. I don't know what is in each of the US physics modules (they seem standardised which is strange to me), but SHM is crucial. So many things oscillate you'll not believe... go through it in that textbook, do all the examples and you should get a good grasp of it.
 
I'm taking mechanics at community college right now, using the same book (Young and Freedman) and it looks like the same thing is going to happen to me. Because of the weak class, we are moving very slow. The teacher said since we are behind, he will skip 1 or 2 labs and catch up. Periodic motion is the very last chapter we have to cover.
Did you do chapters 1-12 and skipped 13 then?
 
I transferred from a community college as well and I had to make up for some gaps in my physics education too...especially in modern physics. I made up for these gaps by studying the appropriate chapters in a modern physics textbook and doing lots of practice problems. This prepartion proved to be more than adequate and now I am in my senior year at a university with a 4.0 GPA so don't worry if you have to cover the material on your own. If you're a good physics student, you should have no problem handling this...although it does require a certain amount of dedication.

My advice is that before transferring to a university, make sure you cover every chapter in Young and Freedman, whether on your own or in class.
 
hate to be blunt, but have you looked at the harmonic motion chapters? Its really not that bad if you have basic trig. If you got an A in the class I'd just go back, read those chapters till you understand it (a day or two?) do a couple problems and wait for the next time for it to appear. Trust me, its going to show up again and again and again, and while you should know it, everything you learn in physics 1 and 2 is going to be repeated in 300-400 level classes in greater detail and you can always pick it up there. You should just make sure you're exposed to it prior so it's not completely new.
 
  • #10
i don't know if there's a difference between the General Physics Course and the Physics for Engineers course BUT I am a Mechanical Engineering major and i found the Physics for Engineers course OF NO USEE whatsoever. The Physics that i have to know and must know is given to me separately in Engineering Statics, Dynamics, Fluids, Thermodynamics courses etc. Also we deviate a lot from the Physics I course, we actually use better methods to solving problems, especially in Electrical Circuit problems.

I don't think it's that a big deal because any Physics I topic is a general idea and it's not something you can't pick up in a book later on.
 
  • #11
Our university (a state flagship institution) does things a bit strangely for engineering students... "Mechanics" and "Statics" part is taught in a two-term sequence by the engineering department, then the students transfer to the physics department for two terms ... E&M and "Oscillations, waves and modern physics." Therefore we cover oscillations (including SHM) at the beginning of THAT term (although it comes up a bit in the EM course with LCR circuits).

So it's possible your institution is delaying the material to a later course... if you plan to finish your sequence there. Otherwise, it's not too hard to learn from the text, as others state.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
10K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K