1. Limited time only! Sign up for a free 30min personal tutor trial with Chegg Tutors
    Dismiss Notice
Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Difference between a conservative and nonconservative vector fields

  1. Nov 30, 2007 #1
    From a mathematical standpoint I have no trouble understanding the difference between a conservative vector field and a non-conservative vector field. It's rather simple. The conservative field can be reduced to some functions gradient vector, doesn't care what path you decide to take, and always returns 0 on a closed loop. However, on my calculus test today on a problem about work I got an unexpected answer. A particle started at the origin, went around the plane z=y/2 ranging from {(x, y), -1<=x<=1, -2<=y<=2} and returned to the origin. The fact that it traversed a closed loop made bells go off in my head. I though, "what a stupid question. No-brainer." But for some reason I didn't put down 0 and worked out the line integral. I got 3, no matter how many times I checked myself. I'm absolutely convinced I did the math correctly on that problem. Our physics professor had always told us that if the displacement vector is 0 then no work was done. At the time of my test I was so convinced to what my physics professors had told me, I convinced myself I was wrong and put down 0 anyway. I was baffled by that problem, so I thought about it on my way to the computer lab once I got out of my test. And it hit me. What if the force field wasn't conservative? It would make perfect sense. That's why the answer, was in fact, 3. However I don't quite understand. What would be a real life example of a non-conservative force-field? Or any real non-conservative vector field for that matter. What are the physical differences between them? Or are non-conservative fields purely a mathematical construct? I'm still grappling with this. I can't get my head quite around it, though I'm glad I figured out why my answer was always 3.

    Sorry if this should be in calculus instead...
    Last edited: Nov 30, 2007
  2. jcsd
  3. Nov 30, 2007 #2


    User Avatar
    Staff Emeritus
    Science Advisor
    Education Advisor

    Hint: What is the curl of a magnetic field?

  4. Nov 30, 2007 #3
    Heh, I have no idea.

    I'll look it up. Thanks.
  5. Nov 30, 2007 #4


    User Avatar
    Science Advisor

    If the field was "conservative", then there would be no work done in moving around a closed path. Did you check to make sure the field was conservative?
  6. Nov 30, 2007 #5
    No, unfortunately I did not even think of the possibility that the field could have been non-conservative at the time. I have been so used to seeing work being force * displacement, I didn't check. I checked on plenty of other problems, but it eluded me on this one. Heh, guess it happens. Now that I think back on it, however, I'm almost certain that it was not a conservative field.
Share this great discussion with others via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook