High School Difference between binding and bonding energy

Click For Summary
The discussion clarifies the difference between binding energy in nuclear physics and bonding energy in chemistry. In nuclear fusion, energy released from mass defect converts into kinetic energy of particles, while chemical bonding releases energy primarily as heat due to lower binding energies. The motion of particles in chemical reactions is closely related to thermal motion, which is the movement caused by temperature. The conversation emphasizes that while both processes are similar, the energy dynamics differ significantly in scale and form. Overall, the distinction lies in the nature and magnitude of energy release in these two fields.
anonymous24
Messages
19
Reaction score
1
Hello,
I am not sure whether it is the right place to post this but I am a bit confused about the bonding in chemistry and the binding energy in physics. From what I have read, in a nuclear fusion reaction, the released energy due to mass defect is converted to the kinetic energy of the product particles. However, in chemistry, the process is exothermic when bonds are formed, is it a similar process? Also, why would the energy released as heat instead of the kinetic energy of the product molecules? Thank you in advance.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It is very similar.
anonymous24 said:
From what I have read, in a nuclear fusion reaction, the released energy due to mass defect is converted to the kinetic energy of the product particles.
Only if two or more particles are created, otherwise it happens via the emission of radiation.
The same applies to chemical bonds.

Chemical binding energies are much smaller, so the motion of particles or the emission of radiation is directly close to thermal motion/radiation, whereas fusion processes produce very fast particles or high-energetic radiation.
 
  • Like
Likes stoomart
mfb said:
It is very similar.
Only if two or more particles are created, otherwise it happens via the emission of radiation.
The same applies to chemical bonds.

Chemical binding energies are much smaller, so the motion of particles or the emission of radiation is directly close to thermal motion/radiation, whereas fusion processes produce very fast particles or high-energetic radiation.

Thank you for your response. I do understand the first part, but I'm not sure what do you mean by "thermal motion", could you please elaborate on it. thank you!
 
Motion of particles due the temperature. I don't understand what is unclear.
 
mfb said:
Motion of particles due the temperature. I don't understand what is unclear.
Thank you, I was just a bit confused but I am clear now. :)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
7K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
10K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K