Difference between enthelpy, Helmholtz free energy,& Gibbs free energy

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion clarifies the distinctions between enthalpy (H), Helmholtz free energy (F), and Gibbs free energy (G). Enthalpy is defined as H = U + PV, representing the energy required to create a system at constant pressure. Helmholtz free energy is defined as F = U - TS, applicable in constant temperature environments, indicating that heat can be extracted without cost. Gibbs free energy combines both conditions, serving as a measure for systems at constant pressure and temperature. The differences are rooted in the thermodynamic conditions under which each potential is defined.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of thermodynamic principles, particularly the first and second laws of thermodynamics.
  • Familiarity with thermodynamic potentials and their mathematical formulations.
  • Knowledge of Legendre transformations and their application in thermodynamics.
  • Basic concepts of internal energy (U), temperature (T), and pressure (P).
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation and applications of the Gibbs free energy equation, G = H - TS.
  • Explore the implications of Legendre transformations in thermodynamics for various potentials.
  • Investigate the conditions under which each thermodynamic potential is most useful in practical applications.
  • Learn about the canonical ensemble and its relevance to thermodynamic systems.
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in physics, particularly those focusing on thermodynamics, as well as researchers needing a clear understanding of thermodynamic potentials and their applications in various processes.

ANphysics
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
I am study chapter 5 of An Introduction to Thermal Physics by Schroeder and I am having trouble understanding his explanation of the differences between enthaply, Helmholtz free energy, and Gibbs free energy.

Schroeder defines enthalpy of a system as its energy plus the work needed to make room for it in an environment with constant pressure P : H = U + PV.

Then he explains that if the environment is one of constant temperature, the system can extract heat from its environment for free, so all that is needed to create the system from nothing is any additional work needed. (Helmholtz free energy, F is defined by F = U - TS).

My main question is why can the system extract heat for free from an environment at constant temperature. Can someone explain this in more detail?

Also, helmholtz free energy, unlike enthalpy, does not account for the work needed to make room for the system in the environment? Is this because Helmholtz free energy is measured when the environment is at constant temperature and not at constant pressure?

So overall, is it true that the main difference between H, F, and Gibbs free energy is that

Enthalpy is the energy needed to create a system out of nothing in an environment at constant pressure only.

Helmholtz free energy is the energy needed to create a system out of nothing in an environment at constant temperature only.

Gibbs free energy is the energy needed to create a system out of nothing in an environment at both constant pressure and constant temperature.

Am I understanding this correctly?

Thanks!
 
Science news on Phys.org
Everything is based on the 1st and 2nd law of thermodynamics. For reversible processes you can write it in the form
\mathrm{d} U=T \mathrm{d} S-P \mathrm{d} V,
where I assumed the canonical ensemble with a fixed number of particles to keep things simple.

According to this equation the work done on the gas, -P \mathrm{d} V equals the change in internal energy, \mathrm{d} U for adiabatic changes, i.e., for \mathrm{d} S=0.

If you want convenient thermodynamic potentials for other circumstances, it's usefull to perform Legendre transformations from the above total differential. While the natural independent variables for U are S and V and because of
T=\left (\frac{\partial U}{\partial S} \right)_{V}, \quad P=-\left (\frac{\partial U}{\partial t} \right )_{S}
to get a potential with the natural independent variables to be, e.g., T and V you perform the Legendre transformation to the Helmholtz free energy
F=U-T S.
Indeed taking the total derivative of this, using again the above law for \mathrm{d} U, you indeed get
\mathrm{d} F=\mathrm{d}U-T \mathrm{d} S-S \mathrm{d} T=-S \mathrm{d} T-P \mathrm{d} V.
Thus the change of the free energy is the work done on the gas for isothermal processes, \mathrm{d} T=0. You have the relations
S=-\left (\frac{\partial F}{\partial T} \right)_{V}, \quad P=-\left (\frac{\partial F}{\partial V} \right )_{T}.
This you can do for any pair of independent variables you like. This leads to the different potentials like enthalpy, Gibbs free energy and other potentials. Which one to use depends on the process you consider. All potentials are equivalent, but for a given process one might be more convenient to handle than the other.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K