Difference between fully integrated vs loosely integrated enterprise-:

  • Context: Comp Sci 
  • Thread starter Thread starter shivajikobardan
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Difference
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion clarifies the distinction between fully integrated and loosely integrated enterprise management systems (EMS). A fully integrated EMS features tightly coupled applications sharing code and data structures, while a loosely integrated EMS utilizes formal APIs or offline messaging interfaces for communication. The complexity of integration increases with the number of systems involved, including external interfaces to customers and suppliers. Ultimately, the terms reflect varying degrees of integration rather than strict definitions, often influenced by marketing language.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of enterprise management systems (EMS)
  • Familiarity with application programming interfaces (APIs)
  • Knowledge of messaging engines for system communication
  • Concept of tight coupling vs. loose coupling in software architecture
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the principles of tight coupling and loose coupling in software design
  • Explore the implementation of APIs in enterprise systems
  • Learn about messaging engines and their role in system integration
  • Investigate case studies of fully integrated vs. loosely integrated EMS
USEFUL FOR

Software architects, enterprise system developers, and IT professionals involved in system integration and management will benefit from this discussion.

shivajikobardan
Messages
637
Reaction score
54
Homework Statement
fully integrated vs loosely integrated enterprise differences
Relevant Equations
NA
I have been banging my head on the wall to find the difference between these two online. I have found only 1 resource which seems bs to me.
here it is..
https://ioesolutions.esign.com.np/notes/text-notes-show/Enterprise-Management-System
can you help me understanding what these two terms essentially mean? is this loose coupling and tight coupling stuff? or what is this?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It's difficult to provide a precise definition for these terms, as what defines tight integration is as much about marketing as anything else.

At one extreme, you could have two sets of application functionality built into the same software from the design stage, sharing code and data structures. That's about as tight as it gets. But, of course, the problem is that the more functionality you pull into your enterprise the harder and less desirable that architecture becomes.

The next level of integration might be a formal API (application-programming interface), where the packages are separate, with their own code and data, but communicate using a "real-time" API.

Next might be communication using offline messaging interfaces. Perhaps using an intermediary messaging engine.

Finally, there might be user interface, in the sense that one system outputs data on an email (or otherwise) for an end-user to re-enter into the second system. This is not necessarily a bad solution in cases where interfaces are rare and complicated.

If you have an "enterprise", then the integration between all the software packages that are your responsibility will fit into these broad categories.

That said, things are complicated by the fact that you may have interfaces to customers and suppliers systems as well as between your own.
 
Bear in mind that integration in the context of an enterprise (which is what you asked about) is a completely different concept to integration in the context of an enterprise management system (which is what you meant to ask about).

Given this, then clearly a loosely integrated EMS is one that is integrated more loosely than a fully integrated one. Any more than that is as @PeroK says just marketing speak.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
10K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 66 ·
3
Replies
66
Views
7K