Difference between fully integrated vs loosely integrated enterprise-:

  • Comp Sci
  • Thread starter shivajikobardan
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Difference
In summary, there are different levels of integration between software packages in an enterprise. These levels range from tight integration, where the functionality is built into the same software, to loose integration, where the packages communicate through an intermediary messaging engine or user interface. In the context of an enterprise management system, a loosely integrated system refers to one that is not as tightly integrated as a fully integrated one.
  • #1
shivajikobardan
674
54
Homework Statement
fully integrated vs loosely integrated enterprise differences
Relevant Equations
NA
I have been banging my head on the wall to find the difference between these two online. I have found only 1 resource which seems bs to me.
here it is..
https://ioesolutions.esign.com.np/notes/text-notes-show/Enterprise-Management-System
can you help me understanding what these two terms essentially mean? is this loose coupling and tight coupling stuff? or what is this?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
It's difficult to provide a precise definition for these terms, as what defines tight integration is as much about marketing as anything else.

At one extreme, you could have two sets of application functionality built into the same software from the design stage, sharing code and data structures. That's about as tight as it gets. But, of course, the problem is that the more functionality you pull into your enterprise the harder and less desirable that architecture becomes.

The next level of integration might be a formal API (application-programming interface), where the packages are separate, with their own code and data, but communicate using a "real-time" API.

Next might be communication using offline messaging interfaces. Perhaps using an intermediary messaging engine.

Finally, there might be user interface, in the sense that one system outputs data on an email (or otherwise) for an end-user to re-enter into the second system. This is not necessarily a bad solution in cases where interfaces are rare and complicated.

If you have an "enterprise", then the integration between all the software packages that are your responsibility will fit into these broad categories.

That said, things are complicated by the fact that you may have interfaces to customers and suppliers systems as well as between your own.
 
  • #3
Bear in mind that integration in the context of an enterprise (which is what you asked about) is a completely different concept to integration in the context of an enterprise management system (which is what you meant to ask about).

Given this, then clearly a loosely integrated EMS is one that is integrated more loosely than a fully integrated one. Any more than that is as @PeroK says just marketing speak.
 

Related to Difference between fully integrated vs loosely integrated enterprise-:

What is the difference between fully integrated and loosely integrated enterprise?

Fully integrated enterprise refers to a company that has all of its business processes and systems connected and working together seamlessly. This means that data and information can easily flow between departments and functions, resulting in a more efficient and effective operation. On the other hand, loosely integrated enterprise refers to a company that has separate and independent systems and processes that are not fully connected. This can lead to silos of information and a lack of coordination between departments.

What are the benefits of a fully integrated enterprise?

A fully integrated enterprise can bring several benefits, including increased efficiency and productivity, better decision-making, improved communication and collaboration, and a more holistic view of the organization. It can also help streamline processes, reduce duplication of efforts, and improve customer satisfaction.

What are the challenges of implementing a fully integrated enterprise?

Implementing a fully integrated enterprise can be a complex and challenging process. It requires significant investment in technology, infrastructure, and training. It also requires a cultural shift within the organization to promote collaboration and communication across departments. There may also be resistance to change from employees who are used to working in silos.

What are the disadvantages of a loosely integrated enterprise?

A loosely integrated enterprise can lead to inefficiencies, duplication of efforts, and a lack of coordination between departments. It can also result in data silos, where information is not easily accessible or shared, hindering decision-making and hindering the organization's overall performance. Additionally, it can be difficult to get a holistic view of the organization's operations and identify areas for improvement.

How can a company determine which approach is best for them?

The decision to become a fully integrated or loosely integrated enterprise depends on various factors, including the company's size, industry, and goals. A company should conduct a thorough analysis of its current processes and systems, identify areas for improvement, and determine the level of integration needed to achieve its objectives. It may also be helpful to consult with experts or other companies in the same industry to gain insights and best practices.

Similar threads

  • Programming and Computer Science
Replies
1
Views
693
  • Engineering and Comp Sci Homework Help
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • Engineering and Comp Sci Homework Help
Replies
4
Views
794
  • Computing and Technology
Replies
8
Views
636
  • Engineering and Comp Sci Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
866
  • Programming and Computer Science
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • Engineering and Comp Sci Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
900
  • Programming and Computer Science
Replies
1
Views
721
Back
Top