Difference between Newtonian, Langrange, and Hamiltonian Mechanics

Click For Summary
Newtonian mechanics focuses on forces and vectors, while Lagrangian mechanics shifts the perspective to energy and scalars, simplifying problem-solving in complex systems. Hamiltonian mechanics further refines Lagrangian principles, transforming equations of motion into one-dimensional differential equations. Both Lagrangian and Hamiltonian mechanics are categorized as analytical mechanics, emphasizing a more conceptual and mathematical approach. While these advanced methods provide valuable insights, they may not always be practical for all physics problems. Overall, understanding these mechanics enhances comprehension of classical physics, but one should balance exploration with practical applications.
Feldoh
Messages
1,336
Reaction score
3
Hey I was just wondering what the differences between the three forms of mechanics were. I've only studied basic Newtonian mechanics so I'm not really sure about the other two. Could anyone elaborate?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
They are not different in the sense you imply. Lagrangian mechanics is a further development of Newtonian dynamics, and Hamilton's work is based on Lagrange principles. So they form a progression.

It is a very large, important and fascinating field of study so it wouldn't be practical to teach it here. I recommend any decent book on classical mechanics, which will take you through the progression.
 
Last edited:
Mechanics is mechanics. Lagrange and Hamilton mechanics are both known as analytical mechanics. The treatment is just more conceptual and more mathematical. It depends if you like formalism. Anyway, give it a try: sometimes it is easier (especially for systems with several degrees of freedom) to solve a problem with these tools rather than with a (in fact: several coupled) Newton equation, which quickly becomes cumbersome. Have a look to Landau or Goldstein books. To be honest, I should however say that analytical mechanics is nice, it gives a lot of insights and concepts, but it is not so useful in the end. Don't get too fascinated by this kind of stuff, and don't loose too much time (physics is wide !).
 
Last edited:
diff. between these mechanics

see Newtonion mechanics deals with vectors like mom. and acc. but then came lagrangian mech. which deals in terms of energies which are scalars and hence equations are easy to solve. but these eqns. are second order differential eqns. .to improve on that and mke eqn. of motion a one dimensional diff. eqn. hamiltonian mech. is introduced.
 
Thanks, everyone, especially nandan!
 
For simple comparison, I think the same thought process can be followed as a block slides down a hill, - for block down hill, simple starting PE of mgh to final max KE 0.5mv^2 - comparing PE1 to max KE2 would result in finding the work friction did through the process. efficiency is just 100*KE2/PE1. If a mousetrap car travels along a flat surface, a starting PE of 0.5 k th^2 can be measured and maximum velocity of the car can also be measured. If energy efficiency is defined by...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
10K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
4K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
6K
Replies
28
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
13
Views
35K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
1K