Difference/convert between covariant/contravariant tensors

  • Thread starter Thread starter roberto85
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Tensors
Click For Summary
Covariant tensors and contravariant tensors differ in how they relate to the coordinate system, with the metric tensor defining this relationship. A contravariant tensor's components are derived by measuring distances along the axes, while a covariant tensor's components are obtained by projecting vectors perpendicularly onto the axes. The contravariant metric tensor serves as the inverse of the covariant metric tensor, satisfying the equation [g^{ij}][g_{ij}] = δ^{i}_{j}. To convert between covariant and contravariant forms, the metric tensor or its inverse is used, as shown in the equations A_{\mu} = Σg_{\mu\alpha} A^{\alpha} and A^{\mu} = Σg^{\mu\alpha} A_{\alpha}. Understanding these concepts is crucial for working with tensors in various mathematical and physical contexts.
roberto85
Messages
52
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


1. Explain the difference between a covariant tensor and a contravariant tensor, using the metric tensor as an example.
2. Explain how the components of a general covariant tensor may be converted into those of the equivalent contravariant tensor, and vice versa.

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


1. The difference is due to the alignment of the axes and the metric tells us what that alignment is. A contravariant tensor can be explained by drawing some cartesian axes and a vector from the origin to some point. Then components are obtained by counting how far from each axis we need to go to get from origin to the point. With a covariant tensor we isntead project the vector perpendicularly onto each axis in turn and measure how long each projection is.
But I am not sure how to use the metric tensor as an example. I can only think of saying that the contravariant metric tensor is the inverse of the covariant metric tensor. Then to add:
$$[g^{ij}][g_{ij}] = \delta^{i}_{j}$$
where $$\delta^{i}_{j}$$ = 1 if i=j or 0 if i ≠ j

2. Combining a vector with the metric - or its dual, which is the matrix inverse - let's us go from one form to another.
$$A_{\mu} = \Sigma g_{\mu\alpha} A^{\alpha}$$
$$A^{\mu} = \Sigma g^{\mu\alpha} A_{\alpha}$$

Unsure if i have given enough detail in these answers, any help would be appreciated

 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
roberto85 said:

Homework Statement


1. Explain the difference between a covariant tensor and a contravariant tensor, using the metric tensor as an example.
2. Explain how the components of a general covariant tensor may be converted into those of the equivalent contravariant tensor, and vice versa.

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


1. The difference is due to the alignment of the axes and the metric tells us what that alignment is. A contravariant tensor can be explained by drawing some cartesian axes and a vector from the origin to some point. Then components are obtained by counting how far from each axis we need to go to get from origin to the point. With a covariant tensor we isntead project the vector perpendicularly onto each axis in turn and measure how long each projection is.
But I am not sure how to use the metric tensor as an example. I can only think of saying that the contravariant metric tensor is the inverse of the covariant metric tensor. Then to add:
$[g^{ij}][g_{ij}] = δ^{i}_{j}$
where $δ^{i}_{j}$ = 1 if i=j or 0 if i ≠ j

2. Combining a vector with the metric - or its dual, which is the matrix inverse - let's us go from one form to another.
$A_{/mu} = Σg_{/mu/alpha} A^{/alpha}$
$A^{/mu} = Σg^{/mu/alpha} A_{/alpha}$

Unsure if i have given enough detail in these answers, any help would be appreciated
[/B]
Please stop using a bold font: it looks like you are yelling at us. Also: read my response to your other post to see how to use LsTeX properly
 
Ray Vickson said:
Please stop using a bold font: it looks like you are yelling at us. Also: read my response to your other post to see how to use LsTeX properly
Apologies Ray, have edited now, appreciate the pointers.
 
Question: A clock's minute hand has length 4 and its hour hand has length 3. What is the distance between the tips at the moment when it is increasing most rapidly?(Putnam Exam Question) Answer: Making assumption that both the hands moves at constant angular velocities, the answer is ## \sqrt{7} .## But don't you think this assumption is somewhat doubtful and wrong?

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K