Difference power dissipation and actual power dissipation

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion clarifies the distinction between "power dissipation" and "actual power dissipation" for resistors as outlined in the MIL-HDBK-217F standard. "Power dissipation" refers to the theoretical power that a resistor can handle, while "actual power dissipation" is the real power being dissipated in the circuit, which is influenced by the power stress factor. The terms are used in different contexts within the standard, specifically in Sections 9-2 and 9-3, where "power dissipation" relates to the power factor and "actual power dissipation" pertains to the power stress factor. Understanding these definitions is crucial for accurate resistor performance assessment.

PREREQUISITES
  • Familiarity with electrical power concepts
  • Understanding of resistor specifications and ratings
  • Knowledge of power factor and power stress factor
  • Access to MIL-HDBK-217F documentation
NEXT STEPS
  • Review Section 9 of MIL-HDBK-217F for detailed definitions and applications
  • Study the relationship between power factor and resistor performance
  • Learn about the implications of power stress factors on resistor reliability
  • Explore practical examples of measuring actual power dissipation in circuits
USEFUL FOR

Electrical engineers, circuit designers, and anyone involved in resistor selection and reliability assessments will benefit from this discussion.

mepiace
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
difference "power dissipation" and "actual power dissipation"

Hi,

Is it possible to explain me the difference between "power dissipation" and "actual power dissipation" for a resistor ? I really can't understand the difference...
 
Last edited:
Engineering news on Phys.org
Do you have some context?
Do you have two different numbers for the same resistor in the same setup?
 
I am reading the standard MIL-HDBK-217F for the reliability of resistors and it talks about "power dissipation" and "actual power dissipation". It just says that "power dissipation" is connected to the power factor and the " Actual Power Dissipation" is connected to the power stress factor but i can't see or immagine any difference between "power dissipation" and "actual power dissipation".
 
mepiace, Welcome to Physics Forums!

I have downloaded MIL-HDBK-217F at http://www.sre.org/pubs/Mil-Hdbk-217F.pdf and searched the entire section number nine and cannot find those terms “power dissipation” and “actual power dissipation” anywhere. The only words similar are here:

“Section 9.0
The use of the resistor models requires the calculation of the electrical power stress ratio. Stress = operating power/rated power, or per Section 9.16 for variable resistors. ...The rated power for the stress ratio is equal to the full nominal rated power of the resistor.”

Will you please post the link or the exact quotation, in context, to assist members here respond to your question. Thank you.
 
difference "power dissipation" and "actual power dissipation"

Hi,

I have downloaded the standard MIL-HDBK-217F from a different site http://snebulos.mit.edu/projects/reference/MIL-STD/MIL-HDBK-217F-Notice2.pdf

Into the page 9-2 is mentioned the "power dissipation" in order to calculate the "power factor'. Into the page 9-3 is mentioned the 'Actual power dissipation" in order to calculate the "power stress factor". I don't know if there is any difference between "power dissipation" and "actual power dissipation".
 
In 9-3 I think the "actual" is just to make clear the difference between the power dissipation of the component in the circuit, and the nominal power rating of the component - e.g. a "10 watt" resistor that is actually dissipating 5 watts has S = 0.5.

In 9-2 "power dissipation" presumably means what it says, i.e. the same as "actual power dissipation" in 9-3.
But for a quick conservative estimate, assuming the components have been properly specified, you might use the component power rating in 9-2 instead. The failure rates for most resistors are likely to be low compared with other components in the system.
 
yes, it makes sense. Thank you very much for your answer!
 
OH dear god - please do not try to learn from Mil Specs... haha - in general the "actual" case tends to be a measured or confirmed value.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
Replies
21
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
1K
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
6K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
8K
  • · Replies 48 ·
2
Replies
48
Views
8K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
8K