Different angle in different frames, intro relativity

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the transformation of velocity components of a photon emitted in one inertial frame (Frame B) to another inertial frame (Frame A) in the context of special relativity. The participants explore the implications of relativistic effects on the vertical component of velocity when considering different frames of reference.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the relationship between the vertical velocity component in Frame B and Frame A, questioning whether it remains unchanged due to the lack of relativistic effects in that direction. They also explore the implications of time dilation on the vertical component and consider the use of 4-vectors for a more accurate transformation.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants raising questions about the validity of their reasoning and the application of relativistic principles. Some have suggested that the vertical component may be affected by time dilation, while others are considering the role of 4-vectors in resolving the issue. There is no explicit consensus yet, as participants are still exploring different interpretations and methods.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that the problem involves a paradoxical situation regarding the angle of the photon and the transformation of velocity components, indicating potential complexities in the relativistic framework being discussed.

Coffee_
Messages
259
Reaction score
2
1.( Everything is in natural units, hbar= 1 , c =1 )

Situation: Frame A is the lab frame. Frame B is moving at velocity ##\beta## away from frame A along the x-axis. At some point a photon is released from the origin in the B frame. The photon makes an angle ##\theta_{B}## with the x'-axis.
2. Relevant reasoning: The horizontal and vertical velocity components in the B frame are just equal to ##cos(\theta_{B})## and ##sin(\theta_{B})##. From the relativistic addition formula, the horizontal velocity component can be easily found being:

##\beta_{xA}=\frac{\beta +cos(\theta_{B})}{1+\beta cos(\theta_{B})}##

My question is, what happens to the vertical component? How does the vertical component in frame B relate to frame A?

The Attempt at a Solution

:

At first glance, I would say that the vertical velocity component remains the same since no relativistic effects happen in that direction. This makes a lot of sense except that this leads to a paradoxical situation. In frame A:

##sin(\theta_{A})=\frac{\beta_{yA}}{\beta_{A}}##

Since ##\beta_{A}=1## , the velocity of a photon doesn't change, and ##\beta_{yA}## is the same as in frame B, this would mean the angle doesn't change at all.

QUESTION: Where is my reasoning mistake? I assume in the last part. Could someone elaborate.[/B]
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Coffee_ said:
At first glance, I would say that the vertical velocity component remains the same since no relativistic effects happen in that direction.
You still have time dilation to consider. Speed is distance per time and the "per time" part changes.
 
mfb said:
You still have time dilation to consider. Speed is distance per time and the "per time" part changes.

So the vertical part would be something like ##\beta_{yA} = \frac{\beta_{yB}}{\gamma}## ?
 
Does it work out with the speed of light then?
 
mfb said:
Does it work out with the speed of light then?

No it doesn't, just tried.
 
What went wrong?
Do you know 4-vectors? They will certainly give the right answer.
 
mfb said:
What went wrong?
Do you know 4-vectors? They will certainly give the right answer.
Yeah I know them but it doesn't work out. It's been a bit and I did some searched on the internet and it seems like there is more general transformation for perpendicular components of velocities which reduces to my expression when there is no horizontal component in the moving frame. And since in my case there is a horizontal component my expression would be wrong I guess?
 
With 4-vectors it works for me. Didn't check the other method now, but it is not just time dilation, right.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
2K
Replies
27
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
46
Views
7K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K