Differentiability of a function between manifolds

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the differentiability of a function between two submanifolds, specifically $$M^n \subset \mathbb{R}^N$$ and $$N^k \subset \mathbb{R}^K$$. A function $$f : M \rightarrow N$$ is defined as differentiable if the composition $$f \circ \varphi^{-1}$$ is differentiable in the context of standard functions in several variables. The relationship $$d(f \circ \varphi^{-1})(x)=df(\varphi^{-1}(x))d\varphi^{-1}(x)$$ is established, emphasizing the necessity of transformations for defining the differential $$df$$. The discussion also acknowledges the importance of considering the inverse transformation $$\psi^{-1}$$ from $$\mathbb{R}^K$$ to $$N$$.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of differentiability in the context of manifolds
  • Familiarity with the concepts of submanifolds in differential geometry
  • Knowledge of composition of functions and their differentiability
  • Proficiency in using coordinate charts and transformations in manifold theory
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of differentiable maps between manifolds
  • Explore the concept of tangent spaces and their role in differentiability
  • Learn about the inverse function theorem in the context of manifolds
  • Investigate the relationship between differential forms and differentiability
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, particularly those specializing in differential geometry, students studying advanced calculus, and researchers exploring the properties of manifolds and differentiable functions.

Maxi1995
Messages
14
Reaction score
0
Hello,
let $$M^n \subset \mathbb{R}^N$$ $$N^k \subset \mathbb{R}^K$$
be two submanifolds.
We say a function $$f : M \rightarrow N$$ is differentiable if and only if for every map $$(U,\varphi)$$ of M the transformation

$$f \circ \varphi^{-1}: \varphi(U) \subset \mathbb{R}^N \rightarrow \mathbb{R}^K$$

is differentiable.

Does this mean that it is differentiable in the sense of a "normal" function in several variables, thus to say $$d(f \circ \varphi^{-1})(x)=df(\varphi^{-1}(x))d\varphi^{-1}(x)$$?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You do not have ##df(\ldots)## while are defining it. You transform ##f## to ##g=f\circ \varphi^{-1}## which is a real valued function which you know how to differentiate. Thus you have ##dg=df\,d\varphi^{-1}## which defines you ##df##.
 
Thank you very much. :bow:
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
954
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
632
  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
4K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K