Differential Calculus variaton of parameters question

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around solving a differential equation of the form y'' - y' - 2y = 2e^(-t) using the method of variation of parameters. Participants are exploring the reasoning behind equating certain derivatives of parameters to zero within this context.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants are questioning the rationale behind setting the derivatives of the parameter "u" to zero, particularly in relation to the general solution and characteristic equation. There is a focus on understanding the implications of treating "u" as a constant.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants expressing confusion and seeking clarity on the treatment of the parameter derivatives. Some guidance has been offered regarding the nature of constants in this context, but no consensus has been reached.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that there may be generalized steps being presented that are not fully understood, and there is mention of external resources that could provide further insight.

Ortix
Messages
63
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


The equation that has to be solved:
y'' - y' - 2y = 2e^(-t)


The problem I am having is that I don't understand why they equatate that part with the derivatives of the u parameters to 0. (see image)
2dwafs2.png


Here they first find the characteristic equation and write down the general solution. They then replace the constants with the parameter "u" and take the derivate.

As you can see, they just say that the derivate part of the u parameter is equal to 0. But why? How? Where did that come from? I can't find it anywhere in my book.

It's probably a facepalm answer but I would really appreciate it
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Isnt the derivative of a constant zero?
 
yes but for some reason in the examples and solutions they even take the second derivative of u and they leave it in the equation. It's just that those 2 "parts" are equal to 0 for some reason that is unbeknownst to me and my buds here in the library..
 
they may be showing you generalized steps that you should keep in mind for the real world and then reducing them since the u1(t)=constant hence u1'=0 and u1''=0 ...
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K