Hello, I was wondering if anyone could explain the troubling divergence here of the differential cross-section for rutherford scattering for [tex]\theta = 0[/tex]. I know it must have something to do with the fact that the em force extends to infinity, which makes sense to me for the [tex]total[/tex] cross section.. Why would the differential be 0 for [tex]\theta = 0[/tex] and not over all angles?(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

[tex]\frac{d\sigma}{d\Omega} \theta = -\frac{b}{\sin \theta}\frac{db}{d\theta}[/tex]

Thanks..

Anna

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**

Dismiss Notice

Join Physics Forums Today!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Differential cross-section divergence

Loading...

Similar Threads - Differential cross section | Date |
---|---|

Pair production differential cross section | Apr 5, 2015 |

Differential cross-section for partonic collisions | Mar 1, 2015 |

How can I calculate the differential cross section, amplitude for given Lagrangian? | Dec 13, 2012 |

Differential cross section | Nov 4, 2012 |

Inverse Muon Decay differential cross section | Dec 6, 2011 |

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**