Differential Equations old and the new

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the differential equation y''[t] + 25 y[t] = 0. Participants are exploring the relationship between solutions expressed in exponential form and those in trigonometric form, specifically how to transition between the two representations.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the equivalence of solutions in exponential and trigonometric forms, questioning how constants relate and how to express one form in terms of the other. There is also exploration of the meaning of the variable 'k' in the context of the sine function.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided insights into the relationship between the constants in the two forms of the solution. There is an ongoing exploration of the implications of using 'k' in the sine function, with some expressing confusion about its necessity and value.

Contextual Notes

Participants are grappling with the transition between different forms of solutions and the implications of constants in the context of differential equations. There is a noted lack of consensus on the interpretation of 'k' and its relation to the known solutions.

jlatshaw
Messages
16
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Given:
y''[t] + 25 y[t] = 0

I know that the solution to this DE is of the form:

y[t] = K1 E^(-5 i t) + K2 ​​E ^(5 i t)

I get that, that makes sense to me, however when I look in old DE books I see the solution to the same problem written as:


C1 Cos[5 t] + C2 Sin[k t]


How do they get this, and how can I establish a transition between the two?
How are they related?

Thanks!
-James
 
Physics news on Phys.org
jlatshaw said:

Homework Statement


Given:
y''[t] + 25 y[t] = 0

I know that the solution to this DE is of the form:

y[t] = K1 E^(-5 i t) + K2 ​​E ^(5 i t)

I get that, that makes sense to me, however when I look in old DE books I see the solution to the same problem written as:


C1 Cos[5 t] + C2 Sin[k t]


How do they get this, and how can I establish a transition between the two?
How are they related?

Thanks!
-James

Surely you must have seen ##e^{ix} = \cos x + i \sin x.## It is one of the most fundamental results you will ever meet.
 
Ok, I guess it's my constants that are getting me in a twist.

Where am I going wrong here?

knowing that:
E^(ix) = cos(x) + i sin(x)
and
E^(-ix) = cos(x) - i sin(x)

K1 E^(-5 i t) + K2 ​​E ^(5 i t)
(Let x = 5t)
= K1 (cos(x) - i sin(x)) + K2(cos(x) + i sin(x))
= cos(x) (K1 + K2) + i sin(x) (K2-k1)

So what should I do from here?
Or am I just really over thinking this one?
 
jlatshaw said:
Ok, I guess it's my constants that are getting me in a twist.

Where am I going wrong here?

knowing that:
E^(ix) = cos(x) + i sin(x)
and
E^(-ix) = cos(x) - i sin(x)

K1 E^(-5 i t) + K2 ​​E ^(5 i t)
(Let x = 5t)
= K1 (cos(x) - i sin(x)) + K2(cos(x) + i sin(x))
= cos(x) (K1 + K2) + i sin(x) (K2-k1)

So what should I do from here?
Or am I just really over thinking this one?

So you have ##K_1+K_2 = C_1## and ##i (K_2 - K_1) = C_2.## You are over-thinking it: a linear combinations of sin(x) and cos(x) can be written as a linear combination of exp(ix) and exp(-ix). Either way of writing it is fine. And, BTW: there is nothing "new" about using complex exps and nothing "old" about using sin and cos: you just fit the form to the problem you are addressing. Some problems need the sin and cos form; others cry out to be left in exp form.
 
oh ok.
One final question regarding this.
When I switch up the constants, I get
C1 Cos(5t) + C2 Sin(5t)
But, I'm suppose to come up with
C1 Cos[5 t] + C2 Sin[k t]

So what should I do about that k? Why is it not a 5? Or does k have to equal 5?

Thanks.
-James
 
jlatshaw said:
oh ok.
One final question regarding this.
When I switch up the constants, I get
C1 Cos(5t) + C2 Sin(5t)
But, I'm suppose to come up with
C1 Cos[5 t] + C2 Sin[k t]

So what should I do about that k? Why is it not a 5? Or does k have to equal 5?

Thanks.
-James

You tell me.
 
Well, I want to say that:
C1 Cos(5t) + C2 Sin(5t) = C1 Cos(5t) + C2 Sin(kt)
and that k is just 5.
Is that right to say?

I'm asking this not because I have trouble determining if k = 5, but mainly to make sure I did my work correct in finding
C1 Cos(5t) + C2 Sin(5t)
then I know that k = 5.
But then that just makes me confused because how would of they solved for it by having a k there and not knowing that k = 5.
 
jlatshaw said:
Well, I want to say that:
C1 Cos(5t) + C2 Sin(5t) = C1 Cos(5t) + C2 Sin(kt)
and that k is just 5.
Is that right to say?

I'm asking this not because I have trouble determining if k = 5, but mainly to make sure I did my work correct in finding
C1 Cos(5t) + C2 Sin(5t)
then I know that k = 5.
But then that just makes me confused because how would of they solved for it by having a k there and not knowing that k = 5.

I don't get it: you know that sin(5t) and cos(5t) are solutions, so k must be 5. End of story.

If you want to make a lot of unnecessary work for yourself, you can plug in sin(kt) into the DE and see if it works; it will work if you choose k properly.
 

Similar threads

Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
2K