Differential form of distances and some other doubts

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the use of differential forms in expressing distances and volumes, specifically questioning why expressions like dV = dxdydz are preferred over simple volume equations like V = xyz. Participants highlight that understanding the differential notation is crucial for grasping concepts in static equilibrium, particularly in mechanics where forces and tensions are analyzed. The conversation emphasizes the importance of a solid foundation in calculus, particularly in understanding derivatives and their graphical interpretations, as these concepts are essential for comprehending the differential forms discussed.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of differential calculus and its applications
  • Familiarity with triple integrals and higher derivatives
  • Knowledge of static equilibrium principles in mechanics
  • Graphical interpretation of mathematical concepts
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the application of differential forms in physics, particularly in mechanics
  • Review calculus concepts focusing on derivatives and their graphical interpretations
  • Explore the relationship between differential forms and integrals in multivariable calculus
  • Learn about static equilibrium and force analysis in solid mechanics
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in engineering, physics, and mathematics who seek to deepen their understanding of differential calculus and its practical applications in mechanics and static equilibrium analysis.

An1MuS
Messages
38
Reaction score
0
1) In a lot of instances i see distances and volumes written in the differential form. For instance
dV = dxdydz Why not just write it as V = xyz (or any other letters, but not in the differential form)?

In the image below, dx seems to be the inital length in x axis, and dy in the y axis. Why not just name them x and y ?

hKp68.jpg


2) In trying to have the static equilibrium of a solid, we sum up the tensions and external forces acting on it. I understand from the image below for the o-x direction, \sigma_{xx} -\sigma_{xx} + F_x=0

but i don't understand the meaning of the differential part.

L08gW.jpg

n4ank.jpg
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I think your two questions are really the same. If you understood "the differential part" of (2), you would also understand (1).

What Calculus courses have you done? To answer these questions, I think we need to know what you know already.
 
Where i live my calculus courses are divided into 3 parts, Mathematical Analysis I, II and III. I have done I and II, which means i studied up until triple integrals, higher derivatives, and a lot of other related topics and probably should already know the meaning of this. However in my courses when studying derivatives we focused mainly on the analytical part and not on the meaning of them, and the graphical interpretation. At least that's what i remember, since it was some years ago.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
6K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K