Differentials? Can you elaborate?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the differentiation of Lorentz transformations in the context of modern physics, specifically regarding the transformation of velocity between reference frames. Participants are exploring the implications and legitimacy of using total differentials in this context.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to clarify the legitimacy of differentiating Lorentz transformations, questioning whether this is a total differential and its applicability. Other participants discuss the relationship between differentials and finite differences, raising questions about the reasoning behind the differentiation method used.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants providing insights and alternative perspectives on the differentiation approach. Some guidance has been offered regarding the definitions and relationships involved, but there is no explicit consensus on the reasoning behind the methods discussed.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that the discussion is not a homework assignment, which may influence the format and expectations of the responses. There is also a recognition of the complexity involved in the relationships between the variables in the Lorentz transformations.

BiGyElLoWhAt
Gold Member
Messages
1,637
Reaction score
138
Disclaimer: This isn't a homework assignment, so maybe it shouldn't be in the homework forums. If you feel it should be located elsewhere, feel free to move it, but the template doesn't really apply to this question so...

* * * * * * * *

So I'm reading Fundamentals of Modern Physics by Eisberg, and I just got through all the Lorentz transforms for space-time coordinates.

In order to do a Lorentz transform on the velocity between reference frames, he differientated (somehow) the spacetime lorentz transforms for the ST coords.

The velocity is presumed to be exclusively in the x direction between both sets of coordinates.

He started with

##x'(x,t) = \frac{1}{\sqrt{1-\beta ^2}}(x-vt)##
and differentiated to get
##dx'(x,t)=\frac{1}{\sqrt{1-\beta ^2}}(dx-vdt)##

I have a couple questions about the legitimacy of this.

1) I think this is called the total differential (?) is this correct? It appears to take the form ##\frac{\partial}{\partial x}x' *dx + \frac{\partial}{\partial t}x' *dt##

2) Assuming this is 100% legitimate (I don't necessarily doubt that it is), when is this method applicable? What are the implications of this method?

I understand that x' is a function of x and t, (it's actually denoted simply x', not x'(x,t) in the book), so the velocity should be dependent on both differentials, but I'm not really seeing the logic behind differentiating this way.

Any help would be greatly appreciated.
Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If ##f:\mathbb R^2\to\mathbb R##, then you can define ##df:\mathbb R^4\to\mathbb R## by
$$df(x,y,h,k)=D_1f(x,y) h+D_2 f(x,y)k,$$ for all x,y,h,k. If you denote the numbers h and k by dx and dy respectively, and simplify the notation for the left-hand side to just df, the above can be written
$$df=\frac{\partial f}{\partial x}dx+\frac{\partial f}{\partial y}dy.$$ You're dealing with four variables x,t,x',t', that satisfy two constraints, the Lorentz transformation equations. These equations ensure that the values of the primed variables are fixed by a choice of values for the unprimed variables. In particular, we can define a function f by
$$f(x,t)=\gamma(x-vt)$$ for all x,t. It's confusing but common to use the notation x' instead of f. So x' now denotes two different things, both a real number and a function.
$$dx'=df=\frac{\partial f}{\partial x}dx+\frac{\partial f}{\partial t}dt =\frac{\partial x'}{\partial x}dx+\frac{\partial x'}{\partial t}dt.$$ Why do it this way? I have no idea.
 
Fredrik said:
Why do it this way? I have no idea.
Ok, thanks for the reply.
I'm just hoping to get a little more insight into the why.
 
BiGyElLoWhAt said:
Disclaimer: This isn't a homework assignment, so maybe it shouldn't be in the homework forums. If you feel it should be located elsewhere, feel free to move it, but the template doesn't really apply to this question so...

* * * * * * * *

So I'm reading Fundamentals of Modern Physics by Eisberg, and I just got through all the Lorentz transforms for space-time coordinates.

In order to do a Lorentz transform on the velocity between reference frames, he differientated (somehow) the spacetime lorentz transforms for the ST coords.

The velocity is presumed to be exclusively in the x direction between both sets of coordinates.

He started with

##x'(x,t) = \frac{1}{\sqrt{1-\beta ^2}}(x-vt)##
and differentiated to get
##dx'(x,t)=\frac{1}{\sqrt{1-\beta ^2}}(dx-vdt)##

I have a couple questions about the legitimacy of this.

1) I think this is called the total differential (?) is this correct? It appears to take the form ##\frac{\partial}{\partial x}x' *dx + \frac{\partial}{\partial t}x' *dt##

2) Assuming this is 100% legitimate (I don't necessarily doubt that it is), when is this method applicable? What are the implications of this method?

I understand that x' is a function of x and t, (it's actually denoted simply x', not x'(x,t) in the book), so the velocity should be dependent on both differentials, but I'm not really seeing the logic behind differentiating this way.

Any help would be greatly appreciated.
Thanks


You can avoid "differentials", by using finite differences and the basic definition of derivative. For a space-time increment ##(\Delta x, \Delta t)## in the first frame, you get an increment ##(\Delta x', \Delta t')## in the second frame, and these are related by
[tex]\Delta x' = \gamma\,(\Delta x - v \Delta t)\\<br /> \Delta t' = \gamma \, (\Delta t - \frac{v}{c^2} \Delta x )[/tex]
Here, ##x = x(t)## is on some trajectory. Now use the definitions
[tex]u_x = \lim_{\Delta t \to 0} \frac{\Delta x}{\Delta t}\\<br /> u_x' = \lim_{\Delta t' \to 0} \frac{\Delta x'}{\Delta t'} = \lim_{\Delta t' \to 0} \frac{\Delta x - v \Delta t}{\Delta t - (v/c^2) \Delta x}\\<br /> = \lim_{\Delta t' \to 0} \frac{(u_x-v) \Delta t}{(1-(u_x v/c^2)) \Delta t}[/tex]
and note that ##\Delta t' \to 0 ## if and only if ##\Delta t \to 0##.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
Replies
20
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
2K