Differentiation: Product rule and composite rule

  • Thread starter imy786
  • Start date
  • #1
322
0

Homework Statement




Use differentiation to verify that the following integrals are correct (where a is not = 0 is a constant and c is an arbitrary constant

(a) integrate xsinax dx= ( −x/a ) (cosax) +(1/a2) sinax+c

(b) integrate tanax dx=(−1/a) ln(cosax)+c

Homework Equations



Composite rule dy/dx = (dy/du) (du/dx)


The Attempt at a Solution



Im not getting the right solution after diffrenting.

attached are my solutions
 

Answers and Replies

  • #2
Fredrik
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Gold Member
10,851
413
I don't see an attachment. For the first problem, you also need the product rule. For the second one, you need to use the chain rule twice.

(Edited after Mark44's reply below).
 
Last edited:
  • #3
34,901
6,645
What both of you are referring to as the "composition" rule, most books that I've seen call the chain rule.
 
  • #4
Fredrik
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Gold Member
10,851
413
Hm, for some reason I didn't even realize that I was just repeating what he said in a slightly different way. :rolleyes: Yes, the "chain rule" is what I'd normally call it. I don't think I've seen it called anything else in a book.
 

Related Threads on Differentiation: Product rule and composite rule

  • Last Post
Replies
2
Views
6K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • Last Post
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
9
Views
1K
  • Poll
  • Last Post
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • Last Post
Replies
2
Views
934
Replies
1
Views
5K
  • Last Post
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
2
Views
817
  • Last Post
Replies
2
Views
2K
Top