Diffraction Barrier-Class of Maximum?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on calculating the order of maximum (m) for a diffraction barrier with 4200 openings per centimeter, using wavelengths of 589.00 nm and 589.6 nm. The calculated difference in maxima is 1.54 mm, leading to a derived value of m = 3. Despite the participant's consistent calculations yielding this result, the textbook states m = 2, suggesting a potential error in the textbook. The participant seeks confirmation of their calculations and the validity of the textbook answer.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of diffraction patterns and maxima
  • Familiarity with the diffraction equation: sinθ = m*λ/d
  • Knowledge of small angle approximations in trigonometry
  • Ability to perform unit conversions (e.g., nm to meters)
NEXT STEPS
  • Review the principles of diffraction and the role of slit spacing in determining maxima
  • Study the implications of small angle approximations in wave physics
  • Learn about common errors in physics textbooks and how to verify calculations
  • Explore additional problems involving diffraction to solidify understanding of the concepts
USEFUL FOR

Students studying wave optics, physics educators, and anyone involved in experimental physics or optical engineering.

Const@ntine
Messages
285
Reaction score
18

Homework Statement



A Diffraction Barrier has 4200 openings per 1cm. A screen stands 2.00 m opposite of the Barrier. Say that for a certain class m, the maximums that correspond with two different wavelengths (589.00 nm & 589.6 nm) abstain from each other by 1.54 mm. What is the value of m?

Homework Equations



tanθ = y/L
sinθ = m*λ/d

The Attempt at a Solution



Alright, we have:

λ1 = 589.0 nm
λ2 = 589.6 nm

λ2 > λ1 => y2 > y1 => D = 1.54 mm = y2 - y1

tanθ ~ sinθ [θ is a small angle)

Also, d = 1 cm/4200 = 2.38 * 10-4m

So:

D = L*m*(λ2 - λ1)/d <=> m = d*D/(λ2 - λ1)*L <=> ... <=> m = 3

My problem is that the naswer the book gives is m = 2. I run the numbers many times, and I always get 3. Am I doing something wrong? Is there a problem in the math or the logic?

Any help is appreciated!
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
I find 3 just like you do. Looks as if book answer is wrong.
 
BvU said:
I find 3 just like you do. Looks as if book answer is wrong.
It's been wrong before, but I wanted to make sure. Thanks a lot for the input!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
6K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
10K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
10K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
11K