I am studying 'ANALYSIS by Lieb and Loss '...(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

usually lebesgue integral is defined in terms of simple function

But

In this book, integral is defined in terms of Riemann Integration !!!

[tex]\int f d\mu : = \int_0^{\infty} \mu (\{x \in X : f(x) > t \}) dt[/tex]

of course, [tex]\mu[/tex] is measure, f is measurable, non-negative

LHS -> general (lebesgue) integration

RHS -> (improper) Riemann integration

Have you ever seen this definition in any other books?

If so, which book ? I need Reference .. HELP ME PLEASE!!

-------------------------------

P.S. Sorry for poor english..

**Physics Forums | Science Articles, Homework Help, Discussion**

Dismiss Notice

Join Physics Forums Today!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Diffrent definition of Lebesgue integral! Have you ever seen this?

Can you offer guidance or do you also need help?

Draft saved
Draft deleted

**Physics Forums | Science Articles, Homework Help, Discussion**