I am studying 'ANALYSIS by Lieb and Loss '...(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

usually lebesgue integral is defined in terms of simple function

But

In this book, integral is defined in terms of Riemann Integration !!!

[tex]\int f d\mu : = \int_0^{\infty} \mu (\{x \in X : f(x) > t \}) dt[/tex]

of course, [tex]\mu[/tex] is measure, f is measurable, non-negative

LHS -> general (lebesgue) integration

RHS -> (improper) Riemann integration

Have you ever seen this definition in any other books?

If so, which book ? I need Reference .. HELP ME PLEASE!!

-------------------------------

P.S. Sorry for poor english..

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Diffrent definition of Lebesgue integral! Have you ever seen this?

Can you offer guidance or do you also need help?

Draft saved
Draft deleted

Loading...

Similar Threads - Diffrent definition Lebesgue | Date |
---|---|

B Question about a limit definition | Feb 27, 2018 |

I Integrating scaled and translated indicator function | Nov 20, 2017 |

B Definite integrals with +ve and -ve values | Jun 10, 2017 |

Logaritmic diffrentation restrictions | Nov 1, 2013 |

Finding the curl in diffrent coordinates by transforming variables | Sep 9, 2012 |

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**