Lebesgue integration over sets of measure zero

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

In the context of Lebesgue integration, if a function f is Lebesgue integrable in a measure space (X, &mathcal;M, μ) with μ a positive measure and μ(X) = 1, then for any measurable set E where μ(E) = 0, it holds that ∫E f dμ = 0. This conclusion is supported by the property that 0 multiplied by infinity is defined as 0 in measure theory. The discussion emphasizes the application of Hölder's inequality, although it notes the potential complication when ∥f∥ equals infinity.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Lebesgue integration
  • Familiarity with measure theory concepts
  • Knowledge of Hölder's inequality
  • Basic properties of measurable functions
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of Lebesgue integrable functions
  • Learn about measure spaces and their characteristics
  • Explore Hölder's inequality in depth
  • Investigate the implications of 0 multiplied by infinity in measure theory
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, students of analysis, and anyone studying measure theory and Lebesgue integration will benefit from this discussion.

AxiomOfChoice
Messages
531
Reaction score
1
Is it true in general that if [itex]f[/itex] is Lebesgue integrable in a measure space [itex](X,\mathcal M,\mu)[/itex] with [itex]\mu[/itex] a positive measure, [itex]\mu(X) = 1[/itex], and [itex]E \in \mathcal M[/itex] satisfies [itex]\mu(E) = 0[/itex], then

[tex] \int_E f d\mu = 0[/tex]

This is one of those things I "knew" to be true yesterday, and the day before, and the day before...but now I can't show it! I need to be able to bound that integral, somehow, by [itex]\mu(E)[/itex], but how? Using Holder's inequality? But don't I need to know that [itex]f\in L^2[/itex] or [itex]f\in L^\infty[/itex] to do that? Do I know either of those? I don't think so...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It's fairly easy, but it's tricky. Basically, we put

[tex]\int_E fd\mu\leq \int \|f\|_\infty d\mu=\|f\|_\infty \int d\mu=\|f\|_\infty \mu(E)[/tex]

Note that [itex]\|f\|_\infty=+\infty[/itex] can happen here, that's the tricky part. The thing isd that [itex]0.(+\infty)[/itex] is defined as 0 in measure theory.
 
micromass said:
It's fairly easy, but it's tricky. Basically, we put

[tex]\int_E fd\mu\leq \int \|f\|_\infty d\mu=\|f\|_\infty \int d\mu=\|f\|_\infty \mu(E)[/tex]

Note that [itex]\|f\|_\infty=+\infty[/itex] can happen here, that's the tricky part. The thing isd that [itex]0.(+\infty)[/itex] is defined as 0 in measure theory.

Ah yes! [itex]0 \cdot \infty = 0[/itex]! I had forgotten about that. Thanks micromass.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
7K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K