Digital to Analog converter concept problem

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the concept of a weighted resistor digital-to-analog (D/A) converter, specifically focusing on the derivation of the output voltage equation for a 4-bit resistive ladder configuration. Participants explore the implications of load resistance (RL) on the output voltage and the conditions under which certain assumptions can be made.

Discussion Character

  • Homework-related
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant presents an equation for the output voltage VA based on the resistive ladder configuration but expresses uncertainty about its derivation.
  • Another participant suggests writing the circuit equations and solving them, indicating the importance of including load resistance RL in the analysis.
  • Concerns are raised about the omission of RL in the initial expression, with one participant asserting that VA depends significantly on RL.
  • Participants discuss the implications of assuming RL = 0, leading to the conclusion that VA would be zero, which raises questions about the validity of earlier claims.
  • Several equations are proposed, with some participants pointing out errors in notation and suggesting corrections.
  • There is a discussion about the condition where RL is much greater than R0, with one participant stating that under this condition, RL can be approximated as dropping out of the equation.
  • Another participant seeks clarification on the meaning of RL being large enough not to load the divider network, indicating a need for further explanation of the concept.
  • One participant successfully derives an expression for VA and acknowledges the approximation made in their textbook, suggesting that it should clarify the conditions under which the approximation holds.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the correctness of the initial equation presented. There are multiple competing views regarding the role of RL in the output voltage equation and the conditions under which certain assumptions can be made.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include the potential misunderstanding of the role of RL in the circuit, the dependence of the output voltage on RL, and the implications of approximations made in the textbook. The discussion highlights the need for careful consideration of assumptions in circuit analysis.

nil1996
Messages
301
Reaction score
7

Homework Statement


Hello PF :smile:
i am stuck with a concept of weighted resistor D/A converter.
For a 4-bit resistive ladder,

VA={V0/R0+V1/(R0/2)+V2/(R0/4)+V3/(R0/8)}/{1/R0+1/(R0/2)+1/(R0/4)+1/(R0/8)}

attachment.php?attachmentid=65838&stc=1&d=1390196087.png


I want to find out how the equation is derived but have no clue.

Thanks.
 

Attachments

  • Untitled.png
    Untitled.png
    12 KB · Views: 577
Physics news on Phys.org
Write the equations of this circuit and solve.
For example:
V0 = R0 i0 + RL iL
...
iL=i0+i1+i2+i3
 
You'll have a hard time doing that because your expression omits RL which is clearly necessary.
 
finally i have ended up with this:


VA/RL=V0/(R0+RL) + 2V1/(R0+2RL) +4V2/(R0+4RL) + 8V3/(R0+8RL)

Any way to get rid of RL??
 
nil1996 said:
Any way to get rid of RL??

No. Assume RL=0. What would VA be then?
 
rude man said:
No. Assume RL=0. What would VA be then?
thanks for the reply :smile:

if RL is zero then VA would be grounded and hence it will be zero.
 
nil1996 said:
thanks for the reply :smile:

if RL is zero then VA would be grounded and hence it will be zero.

Right. So VA depends a lot on RL, does it not.
So your given answer can't be right.

So now let's do it right:
Sum currents at VA to zero: (V3-VA)/(R0/8) + ... = VA/RL.
Fill in the blanks. and solve for VA.
 
rude man said:
Right. So VA depends a lot on RL, does it not.
So your given answer can't be right.

the equation --VA={V0/R0+V1/(R0/2)+V2/(R0/4)+V3/(R0/8)}/{1/R0+1/(R0/2)+1/(R0/4)+1/(R0/8)} is right from my textbook.

rude man said:
So now let's do it right:
Sum currents at VA to zero: (V3-VA)/(R0/8) + ... = VA/RL.
Fill in the blanks. and solve for VA.

i have got that equation on Post No. 4
 
here is the equation:

(V3-VA)/(R0/8) + (V2-VA)/(R0/4)+(V1-VA)/(R0/2)+(V0-VA)/(R0)=VA/RL
 
Last edited:
  • #10
nil1996 said:
the equation --VA={V0/R0+V1/(R0/2)+V2/(R0/4)+V3/(R0/8)}/{1/R0+1/(R0/2)+1/(R0/4)+1/(R0/8)} is right from my textbook.



i have got that equation on Post No. 4

Well, your textbook is right wrong. See my next post.
 
  • #11
nil1996 said:
here is the equation:

(V3-VA)/(R0/8) + (V2-VA)(R0/4)+(V1-VA)(R0/2)+(V0-VA)(R0)=VA/RL

That is wonderful!
Oops, you forgot the divide signs for several terms on the left ...
 
Last edited:
  • #12
rude man said:
That is wonderful!

My textbook says """ Resistance RL represents load to which divider is connected and RL is considered to be large enough so that it does not load the divider network.


For a 4-bit resistive ladder,

VA={V0/R0+V1/(R0/2)+V2/(R0/4)+V3/(R0/8)}/{1/R0+1/(R0/2)+1/(R0/4)+1/(R0/8)} """
 
  • #13
so does RL>>R0 affects the equation?
 
  • #14
nil1996 said:
so does RL>>R0 affects the equation?

If RL >> R0 then RL drops out, approximately.
So then, compute VA for RL >> R0 ...

I have the answer if you want to check yours ...

PS R0 drops out too ... which is obvious if you look at your given solution. Multiply numerator and denominator by R0.
 
Last edited:
  • #15
Can you explain me how RL drops out?
And what does it mean by ""RL is considered to be large enough so that it does not load the divider network.""
 
  • #16
nil1996 said:
Can you explain me how RL drops out?
And what does it mean by ""RL is considered to be large enough so that it does not load the divider network.""

Solve the equation in your post #9 for VA. Then let RL >> R0.
That will answer both your questions.

(The divider network is R0, R0/2, R0/4 and R0/8.)
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
  • #17
solving that i get
(8V3+4V2+2V1+V0)/15=VA
 
Last edited:
  • #18
thanks a lot!:smile:
I got it.:thumbs:
(My textbook should have stated that it is appox.)
 
  • #19
nil1996 said:
thanks a lot!:smile:
I got it.:thumbs:

(My textbook should have stated that it is appox.)

Good work!
Yes, it should have.
A finite RL reduces the output voltage by a constant: R0/(15R0 + RL) instead of just 1/15.

The idea here is that in a real application there will be some finite value of RL; this computation shows that it should be >> R0 or the output voltage will be a function of RL which makes the d/a converter inaccurate since RL is usually not constant.
 

Similar threads

Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
5K