Dilemma of a New Teacher: Should I Stay or Go?

  • Thread starter Thread starter happyg1
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Teacher
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the challenges faced by an individual who has interviewed for full-time teaching positions but has been passed over due to candidates with significantly more experience. Despite having strong student evaluations and a notably lower failure rate compared to colleagues, the individual is uncertain about their future in academia. They are considering whether to pursue a high school teaching position, which offers a fast-track certification option, or to continue in a part-time role at the college level, where they are currently teaching Developmental Math. Concerns include the disparity in pay and workload between part-time and full-time positions, as well as the potential for being utilized merely as a temporary solution rather than being genuinely valued for a full-time role. The individual expresses a preference for the college environment due to fewer classroom management issues but is weighing the risks associated with high school teaching, including safety concerns. The conversation highlights the complexities of navigating career advancement in education, particularly for those with limited experience.
happyg1
Messages
304
Reaction score
0
Hi,
I have interviewed for a full-time position 2 times and both times I was told that the only reason that I was not hired was because the person that was chosen had more experience than I do...however the Department heads both times told me that they want me to stick around to teach 10-14 hours (full time is 15, as you probably know). I only have a year in the classroom outside of being a TA (for two years, plus EXTENSIVE tutoring) and the people that were chosen both have 20+ years experience(CLASSROOM).

I have had EXCELLENT student evals and my failure rate is HALF of my colleagues'. (Not hard to have a rate that's half of everyone else's when the existing one was 50%...)

Should I go to the high school realm or should I go ahead and make $20,000/yr less than those who are teaching fewer classes? (I'm teaching Developmental Math and it's a 3-2-2 set up ((3 hours credit, 2 hours lecture, 2 hours lab...as of this semester, the TA's will run the labs))...we only get 2 hours credit for each class) which means that 14 hours is 7 classes. The full time folks have 5 or MAYBE 6 classes. Is this considered paying my dues or just "we need a body"?

Do you think that I have a chance of going full time? Am I just being used? Or both?

You guys who have been there please tell me what you think.

Thanks in advance,
CC
 
Physics news on Phys.org


Regarding the high school option, does your state have a fast-track to the classroom (aka "alternative licensure" or "alternative certification"), or will you need to take the required education coursework first before you can get a job?
 


Yeah, We have the fast track thing. You are required to take online classes with the University and are allowed to teach in the meantime. There are 2 spots open now for the Fall in Trig, Calc I and Algebra (I & II). I don't know what to do. I like teaching in the College setting because classroom management issues are much easier. The high school here can be scary. Lots of gangs, etc...
 
Last edited:


according to ks_physicist
it sounds like a must
 
TL;DR Summary: I want to do a PhD in applied math but I hate group theory, is this a big problem? Hello, I am a second-year math and physics double major with a minor in data science. I just finished group theory (today actually), and it was my least favorite class in all of university so far. It doesn't interest me, and I am also very bad at it compared to other math courses I have done. The other courses I have done are calculus I-III, ODEs, Linear Algebra, and Prob/Stats. Is it a...
I’ve been looking through the curricula of several European theoretical/mathematical physics MSc programs (ETH, Oxford, Cambridge, LMU, ENS Paris, etc), and I’m struck by how little emphasis they place on advanced fundamental courses. Nearly everything seems to be research-adjacent: string theory, quantum field theory, quantum optics, cosmology, soft matter physics, black hole radiation, etc. What I don’t see are the kinds of “second-pass fundamentals” I was hoping for, things like...

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
858
Replies
32
Views
3K
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
5K
Replies
4
Views
958
Replies
12
Views
2K
Back
Top