Dimension of a Set: Definition & Explanation

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Gear300
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Dimension Set
Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
6 replies · 9K views
Gear300
Messages
1,212
Reaction score
10
I'm familiar with the notion of the dimension of a vector space. Sometime earlier though, I ran into something asking for the dimension of a set of matrices. In general context, what is meant by the dimension of a set?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I would think it's asking for the dimension of the space spanned by the set.
 
Its the number of coordinates you need to specify every element of the set. In R^3 each element is given uniquely by 3 real numbers so the dimension of R^3 is 3. The dimension of a sphere is two because you need only two angles to describe a point on the sphere. The dimsensio of the set of 2x2 matrices is 4 because you need 4 (ordered) real numbers to describe each matrice. In general the dimension of the set of all nxn matrices is n^2.

The definition of demension for a vector is the number of elements in any basis for that space.
 
Gear300 said:
I'm familiar with the notion of the dimension of a vector space. Sometime earlier though, I ran into something asking for the dimension of a set of matrices. In general context, what is meant by the dimension of a set?
NOTHING is meant by the dimension of a set! You must have a vector space to talk about dimension. And since you can add matrices and multiply matrices by numbers, the set of all m by n matrices is a vector space. But it makes no sense at all to talk about the "dimension" of an arbitrary set.
 
My understanding is that the term "space" and "set" are the same and may be used interchangeably.

The definition of a dimension of a set is applicable only to a linear set/space.

As the matrices form a linear operator set/space, the definition of dimension applies as in Deluks917.
 
Thanks for clarifying things...I was sort of confused when I started referring to the dimension of sets without structure.
 
the concept of dimension is discussed for lay persons in an essay by poincare in his collection, science and hypothesis, i believe. some structure is needed to define dimension. so in the case of matrices it would presumably be the structure imposed by viewing their entries as euclidean coordinates. there are more notions of dimension than just linear dimension though. e.g. a circle spans the plane linearly but has intrinsic dimension one according to poincare's criterion that a circle can be separated by removing a finite set of points. some topology at least is needed to discuss "separation".