Dimensional Analysis: Forster Energy Transfer equation

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating Forster's Resonance Energy Transfer (FRET) rate, emphasizing the importance of dimensional analysis in achieving correct units. The original FRET equation, referenced from a technical note, indicates that the rate should have units of "s-1". Key constants involved include the frequency of light (ν), the speed of light (c), Avogadro's constant (NA), refractive index (n), dipole-dipole orientation factor (κ), excited state lifetime of the donor (τD), distance between donor and acceptor (R), normalized emission intensity (fD(ν)), and absorption coefficient (εA(ν)). A critical error was identified regarding the normalized emission intensity, which is not dimensionless but has units of seconds.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Forster Resonance Energy Transfer (FRET)
  • Familiarity with dimensional analysis in physics
  • Knowledge of key constants such as Avogadro's constant and the speed of light
  • Basic principles of photonics and light emission
NEXT STEPS
  • Review the original FRET equation from the technical note at the provided link
  • Study the concept of normalized emission intensity in photonics
  • Learn about dimensional analysis techniques in physical chemistry
  • Explore the implications of dipole-dipole orientation factors in energy transfer
USEFUL FOR

Students, educators, and researchers in photonics, physical chemistry, and biophysics who are involved in energy transfer calculations and dimensional analysis.

HAYAO
Science Advisor
Gold Member
Messages
379
Reaction score
238
Homework Statement
I can't seem to get it right.
Relevant Equations
[itex]W_{ET}=\frac{9000\cdot c^{4}\cdot ln10}{128\pi ^{5}\tau _{D}N_{A}n^{4}}\frac{\kappa ^{2}}{R^{6}}\int_{0}^{\infty }\frac{f_{D}(\nu )\varepsilon _{A}(\nu )}{\nu ^{4}}d\nu [/itex]
I'm trying to calculate Forster's Resonance Energy Transfer rate, but I just can't seem to get the units right. I'm trying to teach my students how to calculate them.

Here is the (relatively) original technical note of FRET equation, made by the original author:
https://www.osti.gov/servlets/purl/4626886

Page 55 shows the original equation. The rate is supposed to have the unit of "s-1".
Constants:
\nu is the frequency of light in s-1
c is the speed of light in m s-1
N_{A} is the Avogadro constant in mol-1
n is the refractive index (dimensionless)
\kappa is the dipole-dipole orientation factor (dimensionless)
\tau _{D} is the excited state lifetime of the donor in s
R is the distance between donor and acceptor
f_{D}(\nu ) is the normalized emission intensity (dimensionless)
\varepsilon _{A}(\nu ) is the absorption coefficient in mol-1 m3 m-1

(Note1: the original equation shows "9" instead of "9000" as I put above. This is because the technical note uses Avogadro constant of #of molecules per millimole instead of molecules per mole.)
If I do a dimensional analysis, it would look like this:
\frac{(m s^{-1})^{4}}{(s)(mol^{-1})}\frac{1}{(m)^{6}}\int \frac{(mol^{-1}m^{3}m^{-1})}{(s^{-1})^{4}}d\nu
\frac{(m^{4} s^{-4})}{(s)(mol^{-1})}\frac{1}{(m^{6})}\int \frac{(mol^{-1}m^{2})}{(s^{-4})}d\nu
\frac{(s^{-5})}{(mol^{-1})(m^{2})}\int (mol^{-1}m^{2}s^{4})d\nu
\frac{(s^{-5})}{(mol^{-1})(m^{2})}(mol^{-1}m^{2}s^{3})
s^{-2}

The rate is supposed to have the unit of "s-1". I must be making some silly mistake here, but I just can't seem to find it. Could somebody point out what I did wrong?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
HAYAO said:
fD(ν) is the normalized emission intensity (dimensionless)
What is the definition of the normalized emission intensity?
 
Orodruin said:
What is the definition of the normalized emission intensity?
Oh snap. You're right. It's not dimensionless. I divide each intensity at certain frequency by the total area of the spectrum, which means the unit is in seconds. Silly me.

You solved the problem for me. Thanks!
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Orodruin

Similar threads

Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K