Dimensionality and vectors in quantum mechanics

chris_183
Messages
15
Reaction score
0
i was reading about the mathematical formulation of quantum mechanics and how a system at any given time is described by a vector represented by an infinite number of spatial complex number coordinates. does this infinite-dimensional state space have any physical significance or is it just a mathematical abstraction?
:smile:
 
Physics news on Phys.org
A vector in that space represents the state of a physical system. It's time evolution is given by the Schrödinger equation.

In case you need something to compare that to: In classical mechanics the state is given by a specification of the location and velocity of all component parts, and the time evolution is given by Newton's second law.

If you assume that the state vector is an accurate description of reality instead of just a mathematical tool (needed to calculate the probabilities of the possible results of an experiment), what you get is the many-worlds interpretation of quantum mechanics. So is that assumption/interpretation correct or not? The question is actually irrelevant. It's kind of like asking if these three dots (...) are really two dots to the left of one dot, or one dot to the left of two dots.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!
According to recent podcast between Jacob Barandes and Sean Carroll, Barandes claims that putting a sensitive qubit near one of the slits of a double slit interference experiment is sufficient to break the interference pattern. Here are his words from the official transcript: Is that true? Caveats I see: The qubit is a quantum object, so if the particle was in a superposition of up and down, the qubit can be in a superposition too. Measuring the qubit in an orthogonal direction might...
Back
Top