Dimensionless equation schrodinger with field magnetic

pirulito.king
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
I can not transform the dimensional Schrodinger equation in dimensionless, please help!

<br /> <br /> -\frac{i\hbar^2}{2m}(\nabla-\frac{ieA}{c})^2\psi=E\psi<br />
<br /> A=(x\^y-y\^x)\frac{H_{0}}{2}<br />

I'm trying to leave it like that:
<br /> (\nabla-A)^2\psi=E\psi<br />
I do not know if I'm posting this in the right place, sorry for mistakes in grammar

thank's
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Okay..let us try...

The particle you are considering has a charge e...So first, we decide that we are going to measure all charges using this charge as the basic unit..in other words, e is one unit of charge..so you can substitute 1 instead of e in the equation...

Let us also decide that m, the mass of the particle, is going to be your unit of mass...then, you can happily put m=1 in the equation...What remains are c and \hbar...

Now you can put both of them as one and...is that it?

Not quite...you see these four parameters are not completely independent in terms of dimension..For example, for an electron, you can construct what is known as the fine structure constant as

\alpha =\ \frac{e^2}{(4 \pi \varepsilon_0)\hbar c}

This is a dimensionless quantity whose measured value is approximately 1/137. The important thing is that this value is independent of your choice of units because it is dimensionless. Whether you choose 1 kg as your unit of mass or 1 gm as the unit of mass, fine structure constant will be 1/137.

So you can put, say, e=1, \varepsilon_0=1 and c=1 but then \hbar will correspond to \frac{1}{4\pi\alpha} units...you are required to substitute this in place of \hbar in the equation, if your particle is the electron...

If you are working with some other particle , you have to use the analogous constant...
 
yes the particle is a electron...its caged in square potencial with magnetic field and i try transform the equation in dimensionless for the computer

but i still confuse how i can do it


thanks for already!
 
Please look at the page "Natural Units' in wikipedia...maybe you can use the Hartree system of units...although I must admit that I do not have any experience of doing computational work with the Schrodinger equation..therefore I do not have any idea of the form the equation ought to have...
 
I read Hanbury Brown and Twiss's experiment is using one beam but split into two to test their correlation. It said the traditional correlation test were using two beams........ This confused me, sorry. All the correlation tests I learnt such as Stern-Gerlash are using one beam? (Sorry if I am wrong) I was also told traditional interferometers are concerning about amplitude but Hanbury Brown and Twiss were concerning about intensity? Isn't the square of amplitude is the intensity? Please...
I am not sure if this belongs in the biology section, but it appears more of a quantum physics question. Mike Wiest, Associate Professor of Neuroscience at Wellesley College in the US. In 2024 he published the results of an experiment on anaesthesia which purported to point to a role of quantum processes in consciousness; here is a popular exposition: https://neurosciencenews.com/quantum-process-consciousness-27624/ As my expertise in neuroscience doesn't reach up to an ant's ear...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Back
Top