D'Inverno page 226 (tidal force on freely falling particle )

shahram.t
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Hi every body,
I am new to PF so I apologise if a similar thread already exists.
I am reading d'Inverno Introducing Einstein's Relativity. On page 226 describes tidal forces on freely falling particle in Schwarzschild metric, I tried to deduce step by step but I can't get final three equations !?
Starting from relativistic equations of deviation how can I get differential equations of spatial motion ?!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
shahram.t said:
Hi every body,
I am new to PF so I apologise if a similar thread already exists.
I am reading d'Inverno Introducing Einstein's Relativity. On page 226 describes tidal forces on freely falling particle in Schwarzschild metric, I tried to deduce step by step but I can't get final three equations !?
Starting from relativistic equations of deviation how can I get differential equations of spatial motion ?!

Welcome to Physics Forums!

It's not completely trivial. Notice that d'Inverno writes "see Misner, Thorne, and Wheeler, for further details."

The orthonormal frame that d'Inverno gives on page 225 is not the orthonormal frame of the freely falling observer, it is the orthonormal frame of a hovering observer. The idea is to transform the Schwarzschild components of the Riemann tensor to frame of the hovering observer, and then to boost to the frame of the freely falling observer. See pages 821-822 of MTW.

I wrote a little about the hovering and freely falling frames in

https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?p=848684#post848684.
 
Last edited:
Thanks a lot for your help George !
 
I asked a question here, probably over 15 years ago on entanglement and I appreciated the thoughtful answers I received back then. The intervening years haven't made me any more knowledgeable in physics, so forgive my naïveté ! If a have a piece of paper in an area of high gravity, lets say near a black hole, and I draw a triangle on this paper and 'measure' the angles of the triangle, will they add to 180 degrees? How about if I'm looking at this paper outside of the (reasonable)...
Thread 'Relativity of simultaneity in actuality'
I’m attaching two figures from the book, Basic concepts in relativity and QT, by Resnick and Halliday. They are describing the relativity of simultaneity from a theoretical pov, which I understand. Basically, the lightning strikes at AA’ and BB’ can be deemed simultaneous either in frame S, in which case they will not be simultaneous in frame S’, and vice versa. Only in one of the frames are the two events simultaneous, but not in both, and this claim of simultaneity can be done by either of...

Similar threads

Back
Top